Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-07-26 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The proved choice cost of the ultrafilter lemma

This item records only the choice cost established by proofs already present in the library.

The Axiom of Choice implies Zorn's lemma, and the converse implication is also proved here (The Axiom of Choice and Zorn's lemma are equivalent). The proof of the ultrafilter lemma applies Zorn's lemma to the partially ordered set of filters extending a given filter (The ultrafilter lemma, from the Axiom of Choice: every filter extends to an ultrafilter). Consequently the present development proves

AC⟹every filter extends to an ultrafilter.

That is an upper bound on this proof, not a lower bound on the statement. Nothing in the argument proves that the ultrafilter lemma implies AC, that it is provable in ZF, or that it is not provable in ZF. Those questions require the later Boolean-algebra and symmetric-model machinery. Until those proofs are built, no Foundations item may use the recorded model results as a substitute.

The distinction matters downstream. A theorem that assumes an ultrafilter may cite that assumption directly. A theorem that constructs one using The ultrafilter lemma, from the Axiom of Choice: every filter extends to an ultrafilter inherits the AC-based proof supplied here. Neither case licenses an unproved assertion about the least possible choice principle.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources