Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compatible almost-complex structures and Kähler geometry

Remark

Every Kähler manifold is almost Kähler, but a compatible almost-complex structure need not be integrable. A Kähler manifold requires that J come from a complex-manifold structure in addition to compatibility with the closed form ω. Thus the existence of compatible J on every symplectic manifold does not make every symplectic manifold Kähler.

For the sign convention used by the examples below, the Nijenhuis tensor is

NJ(X,Y)=[JX,JY]J[JX,Y]J[X,JY][X,Y].

Direct substitution of the vector-field commutator shows that all derivatives of scalar coefficients cancel, so NJ is C-linear in X and Y. If J is integrable, take local real coordinates underlying holomorphic coordinates. On their coordinate frame J has the constant standard matrix and all coordinate brackets vanish; hence the displayed formula is zero on every pair of frame vectors and therefore NJ=0. Thus nonvanishing of NJ is a direct obstruction to integrability; the converse is the substantially deeper Newlander–Nirenberg theorem and is not used here.

When J is integrable, the identities g=ω(,J) and ω(,)=g(J,) connect the symplectic, complex, and Riemannian descriptions.

All assertions are local and apply in real dimension zero. Compatibility makes the associated metric positive definite, so degenerate forms are outside the hypotheses. There is no interval or endpoint assertion, and the coordinate test uses no choice principle.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources