How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A compatible almost-complex structure that is not integrable
Counterexample
On with coordinates and , there is an explicit compatible almost-complex structure with nonzero Nijenhuis tensor.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Let and . Put in the displayed coordinate frame and .
Symplectic conjugation preserves compatibility. Compatible complex structure on a symplectic vector space.
An integrable almost-complex structure has vanishing Nijenhuis tensor ; this necessary implication is the easy direction of the Newlander--Nirenberg criterion recorded in the cited source. Compatible almost-complex structures and Kähler geometry.
Verification
Pointwise preserves because its reciprocal scalings on preserve and it fixes the other pair. Thus [F1] makes compatible. Explicitly, with , , , and is standard on the second pair.
For and , all coordinate brackets vanish, while . Hence . By [F2], is not integrable.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Eckhard Meinrenken, Symplectic Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)