How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A cohomology class obstructs a global symplectomorphism
Counterexample
Let be the standard positive area form on . The symplectic manifolds and are not symplectomorphic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The oriented sphere and its positive area form.
A symplectomorphism must satisfy . Symplectomorphisms, local symplectomorphisms, and symplectic embeddings.
On a compact connected oriented surface, integration identifies top de Rham cohomology with . Integration is an isomorphism on top compactly supported de Rham cohomology.
Verification
Both forms are closed and positive, hence symplectic. By [F2], their cohomology classes are distinct because their integrals are and .
If , then is orientation preserving and change of variables gives , impossible. Thus [F1] fails for every diffeomorphism, exhibiting the global cohomology obstruction.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ana Cannas da Silva, Lectures on Symplectic Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)