Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The conormal sequence is only right exact

Remark

For a homomorphism of commutative rings A→P, an ideal I⊆P and B=P/I, the conormal sequence I/I2⟶B⊗PΩP/A⟶ΩB/A⟶0 of Conormal exact sequence for an algebra quotient is exact at the middle and final terms only: the left arrow is not asserted to be injective, and it need not be. The kernel of that arrow is therefore genuine information about the pair (I,P), not a defect of the construction.

The smallest witness is P=k[x] with k a field, I=(x2) and B=k[x]/(x2). Then I/I2=(x2)/(x4), and the class [x3] is nonzero there, because x3∉(x4) by degrees. Its image under the conormal map is 1⊗d(x3). By Polynomial differentials are free the module Ωk[x]/k is free on dx with dg=g′(x) dx, so d(x3)=3x2 dx; after identifying B⊗PΩP/k≅B dx this becomes 3x2 dx=0, because x2=0 in B. The class [x3] thus lies in the kernel of the left arrow, in every characteristic: for p=3 the coefficient 3 is already zero in k, and otherwise the coefficient dies only after passing to B.

Two qualifications. First, the failure is not an artefact of a badly chosen presentation: it depends on the ideal I and not on the number of generators used to describe it. Second, with additional regularity hypotheses on I the left arrow can become injective, so that the sequence starts as a short exact sequence; no such hypothesis is part of the general statement, and the injectivity is never to be used on this page without an explicit regular hypothesis. The companion examples page records the witness above as a counterexample with the same computation.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources