Egorov's theorem
Statement
Let be a measure space with , and let be measurable with pointwise almost everywhere. Then for every there is a measurable with
The finiteness of is essential: on with Lebesgue measure, pointwise, but on any set whose complement has finite measure the convergence is not uniform. The conclusion cannot be improved to : convergence is in general not uniform off a null set, as on shows.
Remarks
Not proved in this library. It is recorded with citations and used in no proof here.
What would prove it. Countable subadditivity and continuity from above of a finite measure, applied to the sets : each decreases in to a null set, so some has measure below , and the complement of their union works. The argument is short but is entirely about the measure, which this library does not have (Lebesgue measure and the Lebesgue integral ‡). Continuity from above is where is spent.
Which page it serves. The uniform convergence page. That page proves what uniform convergence buys, and it can exhibit sequences that converge pointwise but not uniformly; Egorov is the theorem that says the failure is always confined to a small set, and it is the standard bridge from pointwise hypotheses to uniform conclusions. It is also the usual route to Lusin's theorem (Lusin's theorem ‡).
Depends on
Used by
- Lusin's theorem Remark
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 1 result over 1 level. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Egorov's theorem (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Egorov theorem (Encyclopedia of Mathematics) (standard reference, not scraped)