Alphabeta Math
RemarkSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted) sources checked 2026-07-26 not proved here
Recorded, not proved here. This statement is included so the library can refer to it honestly, with a citation to the literature. It is not proved anywhere in this library: the track that would prove it has not been developed here yet.

Lebesgue measure and the Lebesgue integral

Statement

For ERE \subseteq \mathbb{R} put

λ(E):=inf{k=1Ik  :  Ek=1Ik, Ik open intervals},\lambda^{*}(E) := \inf\Big\{ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} |I_k| \;:\; E \subseteq \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} I_k, \ I_k \text{ open intervals} \Big\},

the Lebesgue outer measure of EE. Call EE measurable when it satisfies the Caratheodory criterion

λ(A)=λ(AE)+λ(AE)for every AR.\lambda^{*}(A) = \lambda^{*}(A \cap E) + \lambda^{*}(A \setminus E) \quad \text{for every } A \subseteq \mathbb{R}.

Then the measurable sets form a σ\sigma-algebra M\mathcal{M} containing every open set, λ:=λM\lambda := \lambda^{*}|_{\mathcal{M}} is countably additive, λ([a,b])=ba\lambda([a,b]) = b - a, λ\lambda is invariant under translation, and M\mathcal{M} is complete: every subset of a set of outer measure zero is measurable and null. The same construction in Rn\mathbb{R}^n with boxes in place of intervals produces λn\lambda_n.

A function f:R[,+]f : \mathbb{R} \to [-\infty, +\infty] is measurable when f1((c,+])Mf^{-1}((c, +\infty]) \in \mathcal{M} for every cRc \in \mathbb{R}. For measurable f0f \ge 0 the Lebesgue integral is

fdλ:=sup{i=1mciλ(Ai)  :  0i=1mci1Aif, AiM disjoint},\int f \, d\lambda := \sup\Big\{ \sum_{i=1}^{m} c_i \lambda(A_i) \;:\; 0 \le \sum_{i=1}^{m} c_i \mathbf{1}_{A_i} \le f, \ A_i \in \mathcal{M} \text{ disjoint} \Big\},

and a measurable ff is Lebesgue integrable when fdλ<\int |f| \, d\lambda < \infty, in which case fdλ:=f+dλfdλ\int f \, d\lambda := \int f^{+} \, d\lambda - \int f^{-} \, d\lambda. The integrable functions modulo equality almost everywhere form L1(λ)L^{1}(\lambda). Finally, every Riemann integrable ff on [a,b][a,b] is Lebesgue integrable there and the two integrals agree, so the Lebesgue integral extends the Riemann integral.

Remarks

This library does not prove any of it. Everything above is recorded here with citations and used nowhere in a proof. The whole measure track is deferred.

What would prove it. The construction is standard and long: countable subadditivity of λ\lambda^{*}; Caratheodory's theorem that the sets satisfying the criterion form a σ\sigma-algebra on which an outer measure is countably additive; the fact that intervals satisfy the criterion, which is what gives λ([a,b])=ba\lambda([a,b]) = b-a and forces the Borel sets into M\mathcal{M}; approximation of a nonnegative measurable function from below by simple functions; and additivity of the integral, which is where the monotone convergence theorem enters. That is the opening chapter of any measure theory course and it is exactly the material this library has not built.

Which page it serves. It is the natural endpoint of the Riemann integral page and of the Cantor set, Baire and measure zero page: those pages prove Lebesgue's criterion for Riemann integrability using only the elementary covering notion of a null set, and the theorem above is what explains why that notion is the right one. It is also the base of everything else in this category.

What is available here without it. A great deal, and it should not be confused with what is deferred. The elementary notion "EE is null if for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 it is covered by countably many intervals of total length below ε\varepsilon", that is λ(E)=0\lambda^{*}(E) = 0 with no measurability theory attached, is in scope, and so is "almost everywhere" in that sense. Lebesgue's criterion for Riemann integrability, the vanishing of the Cantor function's derivative almost everywhere, Volterra's function, Jordan content and Jordan measurability all live inside the elementary theory. What is missing is the σ\sigma-algebra, the measure defined on it, and the integral.

Choice. The construction above is not free of choice, and the statement displayed above is not a theorem of ZF. What is choice-free is the definition of λ\lambda^{*}, its monotonicity, and its subadditivity over finitely many sets. What is not is countable subadditivity of λ\lambda^{*}, and with it the countable additivity of λ\lambda asserted above and the statement "a countable union of null sets is null": each needs a countable choice principle (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω\mathrm{AC}_\omega) ) to select one ε2n\varepsilon 2^{-n} cover per index. If ZF is consistent then ZF proves none of them, since in the Feferman-Levy model of ZF the set R\mathbb{R} is a countable union of countable sets, so [0,1][0,1] there is a countable union of null sets while λ([0,1])=1\lambda^{*}([0,1]) = 1. A measure track built here would have to keep the same ledger of choice principles that the rest of this library keeps.

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources