How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Enflo's space without the approximation property
Remark
Enflo's Theorem 1 constructs, in the ordinary ZFC setting, a separable reflexive Banach space without the approximation property. The theorem's own quantitative conclusion is stronger: there are finite-dimensional subspaces , with , and such that every finite-rank satisfies
This recorded item is non-load-bearing. Under DC, the locally proved implication from a Schauder basis to BAP shows that Enflo's space has no Schauder basis. The pair supplies the Grothendieck reflexive-AP-implies-MAP theorem locally, so the AP conclusion is no longer blocked on a missing external prerequisite; the proof-bearing retirement above carries its own review record, and this historical leaf does not substitute for it.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Per Enflo, A counterexample to the approximation problem in Banach spaces (standard reference, not scraped)