How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The scope and proof status of the finite-Weyl basic-set theorem
Remark
The general local basic-set theorem is the finite-Weyl theorem corresponding to Geck's Theorem 6.6, with its standing section 5.2 hypotheses P2–P8 and P15′ written explicitly. The local chain supplies the asymptotic algebra, integral homomorphism and layer compatibility, Schur leading coefficients, good-characteristic splitting, actual free integral models, lifted-idempotent reciprocity and strict triangularity. Geck's notes cite Lusztig for the algebra constructions, sketch the leading-term and splitting arguments, and refer elsewhere for Proposition 6.7; those source omissions are supplied locally rather than silently treated as proofs.
The hypotheses are finite Weyl , nonnegative integral , the split generic setup, with , and characteristic zero or L-good characteristic: every leading Schur integer is nonzero. The multiplicative parameter is . The full Schur elements may vanish. Requiring all would instead restrict the theorem to a semisimple identity-decomposition situation and would lose its modular content. The general theorem and its cell corollary retain that content.
These statements prove a conditional implication under the exact stated Lusztig properties; they do not prove those properties for an unspecified unequal weight. As source-status context, Geck section 5.2 records proofs in the equal-parameter finite-Weyl case, in asymptotic type with , and the type- reduction, with citations to the relevant original papers. His type and discussions also describe separate calculation-based results. This is a dated account of that source's regimes, not a current census and not a logical premise asserting their proofs locally. No result for arbitrary Coxeter groups or universal P1–P15 is inferred.
The cell corollary uses the dagger twist explicitly. It links the unique leading generic basic-set label to a cell quotient and its specialization; it does not replace a canonical basic set by all cell labels or claim all cell modules are irreducible.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Meinolf Geck, Modular Representations of Hecke Algebras, sections 4–6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- George Lusztig, Hecke Algebras with Unequal Parameters, revised text, sections 18–21 (standard reference, not scraped)