Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not suppliedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-06 sources checked 2026-09-06 not proved here
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Recorded, not proved here. This statement is included so the library can refer to it honestly, with a citation to the literature. It is not proved anywhere in this library: the track that would prove it has not been developed here yet.

Henstock--Kurzweil and Lebesgue integral comparison on a compact interval

Statement

The compact-interval comparison is recorded in Henstock-Kurzweil versus Lebesgue: f is Lebesgue integrable iff f and f are both HK integrable : fL1[a,b] exactly when f and f are Henstock--Kurzweil integrable, and then the values of the two integrals of f agree. The local HK notions and unconditional derivative FTC are The Henstock–Kurzweil integral on a compact interval, Every derivative is Henstock–Kurzweil integrable and satisfies Newton–Leibniz, and The indefinite Henstock–Kurzweil integral of a derivative is a primitive.

Remarks

Not proved here. The cited source supplies the comparison. In particular, it must not be inferred merely from the definition of Lebesgue integrability Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals or from the unconditional HK theorem for derivatives.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources