Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The local tempered Langlands proof and the selected-group boundary

Remark

The positive-real-parameter classification is now proved locally in The tempered Langlands classification for affine Hecke algebras. Its actual suppliers define the full-lattice parabolic algebra, generalized weights and central weight character, temperedness and strict real positive position. The finite parabolic weight filtration and dominant-cone projection give an intrinsic highest projection-norm subspace. It proves the standard module's unique maximal submodule and irreducible quotient, then exhaustivity and uniqueness of Langlands data, including the full central exponent and unequal parameters.

The original native source report and escalation are retained unchanged in the before archive. Neither the classification nor the affine algebra alone implies a whole smooth representation-category equivalence for a p-adic group. The separate The SL2(Q3) Iwahori convolution corner has affine parameters 3 proves the exact selected-group corner for SL⁡2(Q3) by lattice-tree and root-coset counts, with both affine parameters equal to 3, and constructs the invariant-vector action. It specifies its Haar/choice assumptions and makes no block-equivalence claim. This is the corner alternative in the approved parameter-boundary clause, while the general classification retains its full root-data scope. This remark is contextual rather than a theorem supplier.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources