Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The SL2(Q3) Iwahori convolution corner has affine parameters 3

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice. Put G=SL⁡2(Q3) and let I be the subgroup in The lattice tree and Iwahori orbits for SL2(Q3). With left Haar measure normalized by μ(I)=1, let A=Cc∞(G;C) be the convolution algebra of locally constant compactly supported functions and e=1I. Then e∗e=e and eAe=Cc(I\G/I;C)≅HIM(A1,qs0=qs1=3). Here the root datum is the simply connected SL⁡2 datum, with cocharacter lattice its coroot lattice and hence Ω=1. The isomorphism sends Tsi to 1IsiI, where s1=(0−110),s0=(0−π−1π0),π=3. In particular both satisfy Tsi2=2Tsi+3e; the normalized generators Nsi=3−1/2Tsi satisfy (Nsi−3)(Nsi+1/3)=0. Every smooth complex G-representation V has a unital action of this corner on VI, by the convolution integral. This assertion is about the explicitly supported corner and the invariant-vector functor; it asserts no equivalence with the whole smooth representation category or an entire Iwahori block. Its positive-real parameter has quantum characteristic ∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The concrete group, subgroup, root datum, and choice assumption in the Statement.

[F1]

The lattice tree and Iwahori orbits for SL2(Q3) proves the degree-four lattice tree, type-ordered edge transitivity, edge stabilizer I, and alternating-word double cosets.

[F2]

The Iwahori–Matsumoto affine Hecke algebra of a based root datum defines the Iwahori–Matsumoto algebra; for this root datum its affine Weyl group is the infinite dihedral group on s0,s1, and its length-zero group is trivial.

[F3]

The extended Iwahori–Matsumoto basis gives the basis indexed by affine Weyl group elements.

[F4]

Q_p is locally compact and totally disconnected gives the compact open subring Z3 under countable choice, which follows from The Axiom of Choice.

[F5]

Existence of left and right Haar measures supplies Haar measure on an LCH group under AC.

[F6]

A real affine-Hecke parameter greater than one has infinite quantum characteristic gives infinite quantum characteristic for every positive real parameter greater than one over C.

[F7]

On a compact Hausdorff group, the normalized left Haar probability is unique and right invariant under AC (Normalized Haar probability on a compact group).

Proof

1.1F4F5givenalgebrachoose

The determinant equation makes G a closed subspace of Q34, hence it is LCH by [F4]; matrix operations and inversion are continuous. The determinant and congruence conditions make I closed in the compact space Z34, hence compact. It is open in G because its entry conditions a,b,d∈Z3 and c∈πZ3 are open in the matrix topology. By [F5] choose left Haar measure. Its value on I is finite and positive: if it were zero, every compact support of a continuous test function would have a finite cover by translates of the open subgroup I, making every Haar integral zero. Rescale to μ(I)=1. This is the only use of arbitrary choice beyond the countable compactness input in [F4]. For m≥1, let Km={g∈SL⁡2(Z3):g≡I2(modπm)}. These are kernels of reduction homomorphisms, hence subgroups. Since Z3 is compact open, SL⁡2(Z3) is compact open in G; the entrywise congruence conditions make each Km compact open, and the matrix topology shows that (Km) is a neighborhood basis at the identity. For a locally constant compactly supported integrand, each point of its compact support has a right Km-coset on which it is constant; a finite subcover and the nested subgroup basis give a finite coset partition on which it is constant. Thus convolution integrals and their associativity calculation reduce to finite sums; the change of variables y=zu uses left invariance of μ. Compact support and local constancy are preserved.

2.1F1F5F7step 1.1algebra

Averaging on the left and right by e makes a function invariant under both I actions. Indeed e∗f(g)=∫If(i−1g) dμ(i) and f∗e(g)=∫If(gi) dμ(i). The restriction of μ to I is a left Haar probability on the compact Hausdorff group I, so [F7] makes it right invariant. Thus e∗e=e, and every bi-invariant f has e∗f=f=f∗e. This proves the corner equality. The double cosets are open, and a compact support meets only finitely many of them, so their characteristic functions form a vector-space basis.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

The displayed s1 fixes [L0] and sends the base edge through that type-0 vertex; s0=Ds1D−1 with D=diag⁡(1,π) fixes [L1] and changes the base edge through type 1. Their squares are −I∈I. The three right cosets in each simple double coset are explicitly Is1I=∐b∈F3(1b01)s1I,Is0I=∐b∈F3(10πb1)s0I. For the first, reduce the action on the four lines at [L0]: I fixes the line e1 and upper unipotents translate the other three. For the second, use the basis e1,πe2 at [L1], where lower unipotents translate the three lines other than the backward one. These matrices have entries in I, their three images are distinct, and [F1] shows they exhaust the orbit.

4.1F1F2F3step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Under G/I identified with type-ordered edges, the operator given by 1IsiI sums over the three other edges at the endpoint of the indicated type. Two such moves at the same vertex return to the original edge in three ways and reach any specified other edge in two ways. Equivalently the finite right-coset formula for convolution gives 1IsiI∗1IsiI=3e+2 1IsiI. A product with alternating endpoint types follows the unique shortest gallery in the tree. There is exactly one intermediate gallery to any specified final edge of that type word, so the product of the simple characteristic functions is the characteristic function of its entire double coset, with coefficient one. By [F1] these exhaust all double cosets. The infinite dihedral group has no finite braid relation between the two generators, so the quadratic identities give an algebra map from [F2] onto the corner. The basis of [F3] maps bijectively to the distinct double-coset characteristic functions, proving injectivity as well as surjectivity. Rescaling its quadratic identities yields the displayed symmetric normalization.

5.1F1F6step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1algebra∎

If V is smooth, each vector v is fixed by an open subgroup, which contains some Km by step 1.1. For compactly supported locally constant f, shrink m further so that f is constant on every right Km-coset meeting its support; compactness gives a finite such partition. Since π(gk)v=π(g)v for k∈Km, the integral ∫Gf(g)π(g)v dμ(g) is a finite sum. Refinement preserves the sum by additivity of Haar measure, so it is well defined. Finite-sum convolution and the representation law prove multiplicativity. Averaging by e is the projection onto VI because left translation by I preserves its integral and averaging fixes every I-fixed vector. Hence the corner acts on VI with identity e, including VI=0. Finally [F6] applies to 3>1, giving the precise parameter boundary. No equivalence assertion is used in this construction.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources