How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Linear Dugundji extension remains topological
Statement
For a metric space , a nonempty closed subset and a locally convex topological vector space , every continuous has a continuous extension with image contained in the convex hull of (the convex-valued Dugundji extension theorem). The catalogue's intended stronger claim, that the extension can be chosen by a single linear operator continuous for uniform convergence on compact sets, is preserved but not established here.
No metamathematical independence result is a proof supplier for either form; the original paper's arguments cover the convex-valued extension and the bounded scalar supremum-norm version, not the compact-open operator statement. The draft target is Dugundji's extension theorem in its linear form ‡.
Remarks
- Orientation only. Nothing on this page depends on this remark, and the topological extension theory is not part of the Gelfand proof spine.
- Open obligation for the catalogue. Either obtain a complete source or proof of the compact-open operator form, or narrow the catalogue target to the proved formulation; the choice cost of the metric paracompactness input must be recorded in that repair.
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.