Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated sources checked 2026-09-22 not proved here
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Recorded, not proved here. This statement is included so the library can refer to it honestly, with a citation to the literature. It is not proved anywhere in this library: the track that would prove it has not been developed here yet.

Linear Dugundji extension remains topological

Statement

For a metric space X, a nonempty closed subset AX and a locally convex topological vector space L, every continuous f:AL has a continuous extension F:XL with image contained in the convex hull of f[A] (the convex-valued Dugundji extension theorem). The catalogue's intended stronger claim, that the extension can be chosen by a single linear operator C(A,L)C(X,L) continuous for uniform convergence on compact sets, is preserved but not established here.

No metamathematical independence result is a proof supplier for either form; the original paper's arguments cover the convex-valued extension and the bounded scalar supremum-norm version, not the compact-open operator statement. The draft target is Dugundji's extension theorem in its linear form .

Remarks

  • Orientation only. Nothing on this page depends on this remark, and the topological extension theory is not part of the Gelfand proof spine.
  • Open obligation for the catalogue. Either obtain a complete source or proof of the compact-open operator form, or narrow the catalogue target to the proved formulation; the choice cost of the metric paracompactness input must be recorded in that repair.

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources