Alphabeta MathHow statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Scope of higher-order Suzuki claims
Remarks
The finite Suzuki recursion, finite-order cancellation, and the explicit conservative norm bound proved on this page are the higher-order claims supplied here. They use signed term times and charge every expanded term call. No asymptotic complexity claim with hidden commutator constants, no generic nested-commutator estimate, and no free negative-time access is part of this remark; any stronger resource assertion needs its own complete proof and access-cost accounting.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)