How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Under choice, a regular space with a -locally-finite basis has a compatible normal sequence
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. A regular space with a -locally-finite basis has a compatible normal sequence of open covers.
Source convention. In Granath's source, regularity is defined only for a Fréchet space, i.e. a space. The displayed library statement therefore names separately rather than silently importing that convention.
Not proved in this library. This is a source-backed fallback rather than a local proof. The discarded local route chose a shrinking for every point of every basis member and claimed that its families stayed locally finite. That claim is false: with and the one-member locally finite family , the allowed shrinkings have infinite local overlap at every point. The standard normal-cover construction needs additional machinery beyond that failed pointwise shrinking.
Why it remains visible. The Nagata--Smirnov comparison below depends on exactly this standard route. Its dependency marker therefore records that the result is externally sourced rather than pretending that the invalid local construction proves it.
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Umeå University, The Smirnov- and Bing–Nagata–Smirnov Metrization Theorems (standard reference, not scraped)