How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Existence criterion for universal central extensions
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. A group admits a universal central extension if and only if is perfect.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice. First suppose is universal. In the converse, Choice supplies simultaneous lifts of the generators of a free presentation into each central extension.
Proof
For every abelian group and homomorphism , the two maps and from to the split central extension must agree by universality. Since is surjective, . Taking and the quotient map gives , so is perfect.
Conversely, let be perfect, using for example the free group on the underlying set of . Under Choice, Free-presentation construction is universal proves that is a universal central extension. Its proof identifies the exact use of Choice: lifting every free generator through each central quotient.
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the two implications.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Clara Löh, Group Cohomology (standard reference, not scraped)