TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A lax monoidal functor induces change of base on enriched categories

Statement

Let $F : V \to W$ be a lax monoidal functor. Every $V$ -category $A$ determines a $W$ -category $F_{*} A$ with the same objects and hom-objects $(F_{*} A) (A, B) : = F (A (A, B))$ .

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A lax monoidal functor $F : V \to W$ and a $V$ -category $A$ .

[L1]

A lax monoidal functor provides comparison morphisms $F (X) \otimes F (Y) \to F (X \otimes Y)$ and $1_{W} \to F (1_{V})$ compatible with associativity and the unitors (Lax, strong, and strict monoidal functors).

[L2]

A $V$ -category is specified by hom-objects, composition maps, and identity maps satisfying the usual enriched diagrams (Enriched category over a monoidal base).

Proof

technique · direct

1.1

Keep the same object set as $A$ and define the new hom-object from $A$ to $B$ to be $F (A (A, B))$ .

L2given

1.2

Use the laxity morphism of [L1] to send $F (A (B, C)) \otimes F (A (A, B))$ into $F (A (B, C) \otimes A (A, B))$ , then follow with $F (M_{A, B, C})$ to obtain the new enriched composition map. Use the unit morphism $1_{W} \to F (1_{V})$ followed by $F (j_{A})$ for the new enriched identity.

L1L2construct

2.1

The coherence axioms of [L1] ensure that applying $F$ to the associativity and unit diagrams of [L2] yields the corresponding diagrams in $W$ . Thus the data of steps 1.1 and 1.2 define a $W$ -category.

L1L2step 1.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Change of base extends to enriched functors and natural transformations as a 2-functor Theorem

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

Emily Riehl, Categorical Homotopy Theory, Lemma 3.4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
Geoffrey Cruttwell, Normed Spaces and the Change of Base for Enriched Categories, Proposition 4.2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)