How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Enriched category over a monoidal base
Definition
Let be a monoidal category (Monoidal category).
A -enriched category, or -category, consists of
- a set of objects;
- for every ordered pair , an object of ;
- for every triple , a composition morphism
- for every object , an identity morphism
such that the following diagrams commute.
For every , the two composites
agree, namely
For every , the left and right unit laws hold:
The order of the two hom-objects in the tensor product is part of the definition: the factor stands on the left and on the right because composition is "first , then ".
Remarks
The object collection is required here to be a set. This is the standing size convention for the present page, and it is what makes later statements about honest inside the library's current foundations.
Depends on
Used by
- Enriched functor Definition
- Tensor and cotensor in a V-category Definition
- The underlying ordinary category of an enriched category Definition
- A Lawvere metric space as an enriched category Example
- How much of the theory needs symmetry, closedness, and completeness Remark
- The order of the tensor factors in enriched composition is fixed on this page Remark
- A Cat-enriched category is exactly a strict 2-category with a set of objects and small hom-categories Theorem
- A category enriched in the two-element lattice is a preordered set Theorem
- A closed monoidal category is enriched in itself Theorem
- A lax monoidal functor induces change of base on enriched categories Theorem
- Ab-enriched categories are exactly preadditive categories Theorem
- Constant enriched functors need not exist Theorem
- Enrichment in a preorder recovers a preorder, and enrichment in sets recovers a small ordinary category Theorem
- Set-object enriched categories, enriched functors, and enriched natural transformations form a strict 2-category Theorem
- The free enriched category is left 2-adjoint to the underlying-category construction Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- G. M. Kelly, Basic Concepts of Enriched Category Theory, Section 1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Emily Riehl, Categorical Homotopy Theory, Section 3.3 (standard reference, not scraped)