Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A quasi-isometric embedding with coarsely dense image has a quasi-inverse quasi-isometric embedding

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

A quasi-isometric embedding with coarsely dense image has a quasi-inverse quasi-isometric embedding.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses of the Statement, including the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

A subset is coarsely dense when every point of the space is within a fixed distance of it, and a quasi-isometry is a coarse Lipschitz map admitting a coarse Lipschitz quasi-inverse (Coarsely dense subsets, quasi-inverses and quasi-isometries).

[L1]

A map is (L,C)-coarse Lipschitz when d(f(x),f(x))Ld(x,x)+C, and an (L,C)-quasi-isometric embedding when in addition L1d(x,x)Cd(f(x),f(x)) (Coarse Lipschitz maps and quasi-isometric embeddings).

[L2]

Two maps into a metric space are at bounded distance when the distance between their values is bounded uniformly (Bounded distance between two maps into a metric space).

[A1]

Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function >. (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let f:XY be an (L,C)-quasi-isometric embedding whose image is R-coarsely dense. By the definition of coarse density, for every yY the set {xX:dY(f(x),y)R} is nonempty, so the Axiom of Choice gives a map g:YX with dY(f(g(y)),y)R for every yY.

F1L1A1choose
2.1

For y,yY, the upper inequality for f gives L1dX(g(y),g(y))CdY(f(g(y)),f(g(y)))dY(y,y)+2R, so dX(g(y),g(y))LdY(y,y)+L(C+2R). Likewise dY(y,y)dY(y,f(g(y)))+dY(f(g(y)),f(g(y)))+dY(f(g(y)),y) is at most 2R+LdX(g(y),g(y))+C, so g is a quasi-isometric embedding.

L1step 1.1
3.1

By step 1.1 the composite fg is at bounded distance at most R from idY. Also L1dX(g(f(x)),x)CdY(f(g(f(x))),f(x))R, so dX(g(f(x)),x)L(C+R) for every xX; hence gf is at bounded distance from idX. Therefore g is a coarse Lipschitz quasi-inverse of f.

F1L2step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources