How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Right enriched adjoints preserve weighted limits
Statement
If is left adjoint to in the enriched sense, then preserves every enriched weighted limit that exists in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An enriched adjunction and a weighted limit in .
An enriched adjunction is a natural isomorphism (Enriched adjunction).
A weighted limit represents the enriched natural-transformation object against the hom-functor (Enriched weighted limit).
Proof
For each , apply [L1] with to identify with .
Because is a weighted limit, [L2] identifies with the enriched transformation object . Using [L1] again pointwise in the diagram variable replaces by .
Step 2.1 is exactly the representing property for as the weighted limit of . Therefore preserves the weighted limit.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- G. M. Kelly, Basic Concepts of Enriched Category Theory, Section 3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)