How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Enriched adjoint functor theorem for cotensored categories
Statement
Assume and are tensored and cotensored -categories. For an ordinary adjunction between their underlying categories, the following data are equivalent:
- an enriched adjunction whose underlying adjunction is the given one;
- a -functor structure on together with coherent natural isomorphisms .
Dually, this is equivalent to a -functor structure on together with coherent natural isomorphisms .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Tensored and cotensored -categories and an ordinary adjunction on their underlying categories.
An enriched adjunction is an isomorphism of enriched hom-objects natural in both variables (Enriched adjunction).
Cotensors are represented by the enriched hom-objects against base objects (Tensor and cotensor in a V-category).
Proof
Assume first that is an enriched adjunction. Applying the hom-object isomorphism of [L1] to the cotensor object and then reading the cotensor universal properties from [L2] shows that represents the same functor as . Therefore preserves cotensors.
Conversely, assume has the stated -functor structure and coherent cotensor-preservation isomorphisms. For each base object , the ordinary adjunction identifies maps with maps . Cotensor preservation rewrites the target as , and applying the cotensor representing property of [L2] again converts this into maps naturally in . By Yoneda in the base, these natural bijections determine a -natural isomorphism , giving [L1] and the compatible enriched structure on .
Thus a coherent enriched structure on the right adjoint together with cotensor preservation is equivalent to lifting the underlying adjunction to an enriched one. The tensor statement is dual.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Marzieh Bayeh et al., Left-Induced Model Structures and Diagram Categories, Definition A.3 (standard reference, not scraped)