How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Abelianisation is left adjoint to the inclusion of abelian groups
Statement
Abelianisation defines a functor , and it is left adjoint to the inclusion . Explicitly, every homomorphism with abelian factors uniquely through the quotient .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group , an abelian group , and a homomorphism .
The abelianisation of is (The abelianisation and its canonical map).
For , their commutator is , and is generated by all commutators (Commutators and the commutator subgroup ).
A homomorphism that kills a normal subgroup factors uniquely through the quotient group (A homomorphism that kills a normal subgroup factors uniquely through the quotient group).
Chosen objectwise universal arrows assemble uniquely into a left adjoint (Chosen objectwise universal arrows assemble uniquely into a left adjoint).
Proof
Since is abelian, for all , so .
The group is abelian: has kernel by [F1], so for the commutator is trivial by [F2], and is surjective.
By [F3], there is a unique homomorphism with .
For a homomorphism , the target is abelian by step 1.2, so step 2.1 applies to ; define as its unique factor through .
Uniqueness in [F3] gives and , so abelianisation is a functor and is natural.
Step 2.1 is the universal-arrow property of from to the inclusion ; [L1] therefore gives .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 36 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tom Leinster, Basic Category Theory, Example 2.1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Example 4.1.10 (standard reference, not scraped)