Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A homomorphism that kills a normal subgroup factors uniquely through the quotient group

Statement

A homomorphism that kills a normal subgroup factors uniquely through the quotient group.

If NGN\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G, f:GHf:G\to H is a homomorphism, and NkerfN\subseteq\ker f, then there is a unique homomorphism fˉ:G/NH\bar f:G/N\to H such that fˉ(gN)=f(g)\bar f(gN)=f(g) and f=fˉπf=\bar f\circ\pi.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: NGN\mathrel{\trianglelefteq}G, a homomorphism f:GHf:G\to H, and NkerfN\subseteq\ker f.

[L1]

G/NG/N is the group of cosets of a normal subgroup (The quotient group G/NG/N and coset product (gN)(hN)=ghN(gN)(hN)=ghN).

[L3]

NkerfN\subseteq\ker f means that f(n)=eHf(n)=e_H for every nNn\in N (The kernel and image of a group homomorphism).

[L5]

A group homomorphism preserves products (Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Define fˉ(gN):=f(g)\bar f(gN):=f(g); if gN=hNgN=hN, then h1gNkerfh^{-1}g\in N\subseteq\ker f, so [L4] proves that this value is independent of the representative.

L1L2L3L4L5givenconstruct
2.1

For cosets, fˉ((gN)(hN))=f(gh)=f(g)f(h)\bar f((gN)(hN))=f(gh)=f(g)f(h), and f(g)=fˉ(π(g))f(g)=\bar f(\pi(g)).

step 1.1L1L2L3L4L5givenalgebra
3.1

The surjectivity used in step 2.1 forces any such factor map to have these values, hence proves uniqueness.

step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 38 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources