Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Torsion-free abelian groups form a reflective full subcategory of abelian groups

Statement

The full subcategory of torsion-free abelian groups is reflective in Ab. For an abelian group G, regarded as a Z-module, its reflector is GG/Tor(G), with unit the quotient map.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An abelian group G, regarded as a Z-module.

[L1]

An element is torsion when a nonzero integer annihilates it, and a module is torsion-free when its torsion set is the zero subgroup (Annihilators, torsion elements and the torsion subset of a module).

[L2]

A homomorphism killing a normal subgroup factors uniquely through the corresponding quotient group (A homomorphism that kills a normal subgroup factors uniquely through the quotient group).

[L3]

A full subcategory A of C is reflective when the inclusion I has a left adjoint RI (Reflective full subcategory and reflector).

[L4]

For a full subcategory, supplying a reflector R with an adjunction RI is equivalent to supplying, for every object CC, a specified universal arrow (RC,ηC) from C to I; under that equivalence the specified universal arrows are the components of the reflection unit (A full subcategory is reflectively structured exactly when universal arrows are supplied at every ambient object).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

If nonzero integers m,n kill x,yG, then mn kills x+y, and m kills x; hence Tor(G) is a subgroup. If n(g+Tor(G))=0 in the quotient for nonzero n, then ng is torsion, so some nonzero m has mng=0; since mn0 in Z, g is torsion. Thus the quotient is torsion-free.

L1algebraconstruct
2.1

If f:GH and H is torsion-free, every torsion element x has nonzero n with nf(x)=f(nx)=0, so [L1] gives f(x)=0. Hence Tor(G)kerf, and [L2] gives a unique fˉ:G/Tor(G)H through which f factors.

step 1.1L1L2
3.1

Step 2.1 supplies, for every abelian group G, the quotient map GG/Tor(G) together with the unique factorisation of any map into a torsion-free group; that is exactly a specified universal arrow from G to the inclusion. By the equivalence in [L4] these supplied arrows assemble into a reflector R with RI, which by [L3] says the full torsion-free subcategory is reflective, with unit the quotient map.

step 2.1L3L4discharge-construct

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 40 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources