Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Torsion-free abelian groups form a reflective full subcategory of abelian groups

Statement

The full subcategory of torsion-free abelian groups is reflective in Ab. For an abelian group G, regarded as a Z-module, its reflector is G⟼G/Tor⁡(G), with unit the quotient map.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An abelian group G, regarded as a Z-module.

[L1]

An element is torsion when a nonzero integer annihilates it, and a module is torsion-free when its torsion set is the zero subgroup (Annihilators, torsion elements and the torsion subset of a module).

[L2]

A homomorphism killing a normal subgroup factors uniquely through the corresponding quotient group (A homomorphism that kills a normal subgroup factors uniquely through the quotient group).

[L3]

A full subcategory A of C is reflective when the inclusion I has a left adjoint R⊣I (Reflective full subcategory and reflector).

[L4]

For a full subcategory, supplying a reflector R with an adjunction R⊣I is equivalent to supplying, for every object C∈C, a specified universal arrow (RC,ηC) from C to I; under that equivalence the specified universal arrows are the components of the reflection unit (A full subcategory is reflectively structured exactly when universal arrows are supplied at every ambient object).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1L1algebraconstruct

If nonzero integers m,n kill x,y∈G, then mn kills x+y, and m kills −x; hence Tor⁡(G) is a subgroup. If n(g+Tor⁡(G))=0 in the quotient for nonzero n, then ng is torsion, so some nonzero m has mng=0; since mn≠0 in Z, g is torsion. Thus the quotient is torsion-free.

2.1step 1.1L1L2

If f:G→H and H is torsion-free, every torsion element x has nonzero n with nf(x)=f(nx)=0, so [L1] gives f(x)=0. Hence Tor⁡(G)⊆ker⁡f, and [L2] gives a unique fˉ:G/Tor⁡(G)→H through which f factors.

3.1step 2.1L3L4discharge-construct∎

Step 2.1 supplies, for every abelian group G, the quotient map G→G/Tor⁡(G) together with the unique factorisation of any map into a torsion-free group; that is exactly a specified universal arrow from G to the inclusion. By the equivalence in [L4] these supplied arrows assemble into a reflector R with R⊣I, which by [L3] says the full torsion-free subcategory is reflective, with unit the quotient map.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources