How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Commutative rings form a reflective full subcategory of rings
Statement
Let be the full subcategory of commutative unital rings inside the category of unital rings. It is reflective. For a ring , let be the two-sided ideal generated by all commutators . The reflector sends and the reflection unit is the quotient map. If , the quotient is the zero ring; the unital-ring convention permits this degenerate case.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital ring and the set .
Unital rings and unit-preserving homomorphisms form the category (Unital rings and unit-preserving ring homomorphisms form the large locally small category , Ring homomorphism: additive, multiplicative, and required to send to ).
The ideal generated by a subset is the least two-sided ideal containing it (The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals).
For every two-sided ideal , the quotient is a ring; this includes , whose quotient is the zero ring (The quotient ring with , For a two-sided ideal , the additive cosets form a ring with identity ).
If , a ring homomorphism factors uniquely through (A ring homomorphism whose kernel contains a two-sided ideal factors uniquely through the quotient ring).
Supplied universal arrows to a full inclusion assemble into a reflector (A full subcategory is reflectively structured exactly when universal arrows are supplied at every ambient object, Reflective full subcategory and reflector).
The kernel of a ring homomorphism is a two-sided ideal (The kernel of a ring homomorphism is a two-sided ideal).
Proof
Put using [L2]. In , , so [L3] makes a commutative ring. This computation remains valid when : then is the permitted zero ring, so the construction is total.
Let be a unit-preserving homomorphism to a commutative ring. Then , so . The kernel of a ring homomorphism is a two-sided ideal by [L6], so leastness in [L2] gives , and [L4] supplies a unique homomorphism with . Unit preservation is retained by [L4], including the zero-ring case.
Step 2.1 is exactly the universal-arrow property of the quotient map to the full inclusion . The family is supplied by the explicit formula , so [L5] assembles it into the reflector.
Depends on
- Reflective full subcategory and reflector
- A full subcategory is reflectively structured exactly when universal arrows are supplied at every ambient object
- Unital rings and unit-preserving ring homomorphisms form the large locally small category $\mathbf{Ring}$
- The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals
- The quotient ring $R/I$ with $(r+I)(s+I)=rs+I$
- For a two-sided ideal $I$, the additive cosets form a ring $R/I$ with identity $1+I$
- Ring homomorphism: additive, multiplicative, and required to send $1$ to $1$
- A ring homomorphism whose kernel contains a two-sided ideal factors uniquely through the quotient ring
- The kernel of a ring homomorphism is a two-sided ideal
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 68 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, example 4.5.13(ii) (standard reference, not scraped)