How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Uniform oscillatory tail mass forces failure of absolute convergence
Statement
Let be monotone on and suppose diverges. Let tend to infinity and satisfy for some , and suppose a locally integrable satisfies for every . Then diverges, so cannot converge absolutely.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The nonnegative monotone , bounded-gap sequence, and uniform block mass in the statement.
Proper integration preserves order and is additive on adjacent intervals (If on and both are integrable then ; and , For : is integrable on if and only if it is integrable on and on , and then ; with the oriented form for arbitrary ).
A nonnegative improper integral converges exactly when its truncations are bounded (A nonnegative improper integral converges iff its truncated integrals are bounded).
Removing finitely many terms does not affect divergence of a nonnegative series (A series converges iff each of its tail series converges, and the sum splits as plus the -th tail).
Proof
Suppose first that is nonincreasing. On the th block, , hence [L1, L2, L3] Also . Since diverges, additivity and [L2] force , and hence its shifted tail, to diverge. Thus the block lower bounds for have unbounded partial sums.
If is nondecreasing, divergence of its integral implies it is positive at some point; thereafter is bounded below by a positive constant. Now , whose partial sums diverge.
In either monotonicity case the nonnegative truncations of are unbounded, so [L2] proves divergence and the definition rules out absolute convergence.
Depends on
- A nonnegative improper integral converges iff its truncated integrals are bounded
- Absolute and conditional convergence of improper integrals
- If $f \le g$ on $[a,b]$ and both are integrable then $\int_a^b f \le \int_a^b g$; and $m(b-a) \le \int_a^b f \le M(b-a)$
- For $a<c<b$: $f$ is integrable on $[a,b]$ if and only if it is integrable on $[a,c]$ and on $[c,b]$, and then $\int_a^b f = \int_a^c f + \int_c^b f$; with the oriented form for arbitrary $a,b,c$
- Nondecreasing, increasing (strictly increasing), nonincreasing, decreasing, monotone and strictly monotone real functions on a subset of $\mathbb{R}$, with the dictionary to monotone sequences
- Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences
- Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series
- A series converges iff each of its tail series converges, and the sum splits as $s_N$ plus the $N$-th tail
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 96 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- William F. Trench, Introduction to Real Analysis, exercises following Section 3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)