Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A nonnegative improper integral converges iff its truncated integrals are bounded

Statement

Let f0f\ge0 be Riemann integrable on every compact subinterval of [a,)[a,\infty). Then af\int_a^\infty f converges if and only if the set {aRf:R>a}\left\{\int_a^R f:R>a\right\} is bounded above. In the convergent case its supremum is the value of the improper integral. The analogous assertion holds at either finite singular endpoint and at -\infty, with truncations directed toward that endpoint.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonnegative, locally Riemann-integrable ff at one singular end.

[L2]

A bounded monotone real sequence converges to its supremum or infimum (A monotone sequence converges if and only if it is bounded).

[L3]

Finite truncations may be moved without changing convergence (Improper convergence is independent of finite truncations and split points).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

At ++\infty, F(R)=aRfF(R)=\int_a^R f is nondecreasing by [L1]. If F(R)F(R) converges, its range is bounded. Conversely, if its range is bounded above, the integer sequence F(n)F(n) is bounded and nondecreasing, so [L2] gives F(n)S=supnF(n)F(n)\to S=\sup_nF(n).

L1L2
2.1

For nRn+1n\le R\le n+1, monotonicity gives F(n)F(R)F(n+1)F(n)\le F(R)\le F(n+1). Hence F(R)SF(R)\to S. Every real truncation lies below a later integer truncation, so SS is also the supremum of the full truncation range.

step 1.1L1
3.1

Reciprocal truncations and the same squeeze prove the finite-endpoint forms; reversing orientation proves the -\infty form. Moving the initial finite endpoint is harmless by [L3].

L3

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 67 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources