Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Affine Clifford–Hopf maps are highly connected

Statement

Assume AC. Let k=4m−1, d≥1, and let ρ be a positive orthogonal Ck representation on Rp. Let sk be the irreducible real dimension. If p≥p0(d,k) and skd≤η≤p/4, then the inclusion Hopf⁡ρ(Sk,SO(p))η↪Map⁡∗(Sk,SO(p))η is d-connected for finite CW pairs. Here the right-hand side is the union of mapping components of stable winding η. The left-hand side consists of I on an invariant L0 and x0I+∑j=1kxjJj on an invariant L1, where Rp=L0⊕L1 and dim⁡CL1=η relative to i=J1⋯Jk−2.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed; it implies the countable-choice assumptions in the differential-geometric suppliers. No stronger choice principle is introduced. (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

The preceding suspensions are d-connected in the stated size range, and the last path winding is w=p/4−η. (Iterated suspension and winding control).

[F2]

For l=k−1, p−4∣w∣≥4dsl makes all nonminimal indices greater than d, giving relative path shortening. (Real Clifford block-rotation index bounds, Relative path-shortening connectivity from index bounds).

[F3]

Finite CW inclusions have the relative homotopy extension property. (Relative CW inclusions are cofibrations).

Proof

technique · direct construction

Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2algebra

The terminal winding is w=p/4−η≥0, and sl=sk, so p−4∣w∣=4η≥4dsl. Apply [F2] to shorten the variable second path, fixing the prescribed parameter boundary. A minimal second path is determined by an invariant splitting Rp=L0⊕L1, with midpoint +Jk on L0 and −Jk on L1. Its determinant winding gives dim⁡CL1=η. Combining with [F1] yields a d-connected map from the splitting space into the sphere mapping space.

2.1F1step 1.1construct

On L0 the terminal loop is a path followed by its reverse. Contract it by replacing γ(t) by γ(st), 1≥s≥0, before taking that concatenation. This is a based contraction continuous in the splitting projection. On L1 the loop is the full positive Clifford circle. After the earlier suspensions the latter becomes the positive linear Hopf map, by expanding the cosine and sine suspension coordinates.

3.1step 2.1constructalgebra

There is an additional correction on L0: iterated suspension of its constant loop is a folded hemisphere map, not literally a constant sphere map. Its image lies in the closed hemisphere of the great sphere spanned by I,J1,…,Jl, with nonnegative Jl coefficient, a product of nonnegative suspension sine factors. Write a point as (y,a) with a≥0 and ∣y∣2+a2=1. Stereographic projection from −Jl gives z=y/(1+a) in the closed unit ball, with I at e0. Set zs=(1−s)z+se0 and ys=2zs1+∣zs∣2,as=1−∣zs∣21+∣zs∣2. This contracts the hemisphere to I while fixing I. Every sphere point remains an orthogonal Clifford matrix. Apply this on L0 and keep the Hopf map on L1. The universal scalar formulas and invariant projections make the homotopy continuous in the splitting.

4.1F3step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1construct∎

The invariant splitting space is a compact Grassmannian. Its projection P1 is recovered from the affine map by P1=(I−ϕ(−e0))/2. Thus splitting-to-affine-map is a homeomorphism onto the affine subspace. Step 2.1 and step 3.1 show that the d-connected map of step 1.1 is homotopic to that homeomorphism followed by the actual affine inclusion. Homotopy invariance of relative homotopy groups therefore makes the inclusion d-connected. Equivalently, extend the resulting relative disk homotopies over cells, using [F3]. This last argument keeps arbitrary prescribed affine boundary maps fixed; it does not infer connectivity merely from a set-theoretic image.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources