How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Affine Clifford–Hopf maps are highly connected
Statement
Assume AC. Let , , and let be a positive orthogonal representation on . Let be the irreducible real dimension. If and , then the inclusion is -connected for finite CW pairs. Here the right-hand side is the union of mapping components of stable winding . The left-hand side consists of on an invariant and on an invariant , where and relative to .
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice is assumed; it implies the countable-choice assumptions in the differential-geometric suppliers. No stronger choice principle is introduced. (The Axiom of Choice).
The preceding suspensions are -connected in the stated size range, and the last path winding is . (Iterated suspension and winding control).
For , makes all nonminimal indices greater than , giving relative path shortening. (Real Clifford block-rotation index bounds, Relative path-shortening connectivity from index bounds).
Finite CW inclusions have the relative homotopy extension property. (Relative CW inclusions are cofibrations).
Proof
Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.
The terminal winding is , and , so . Apply [F2] to shorten the variable second path, fixing the prescribed parameter boundary. A minimal second path is determined by an invariant splitting , with midpoint on and on . Its determinant winding gives . Combining with [F1] yields a -connected map from the splitting space into the sphere mapping space.
On the terminal loop is a path followed by its reverse. Contract it by replacing by , , before taking that concatenation. This is a based contraction continuous in the splitting projection. On the loop is the full positive Clifford circle. After the earlier suspensions the latter becomes the positive linear Hopf map, by expanding the cosine and sine suspension coordinates.
There is an additional correction on : iterated suspension of its constant loop is a folded hemisphere map, not literally a constant sphere map. Its image lies in the closed hemisphere of the great sphere spanned by , with nonnegative coefficient, a product of nonnegative suspension sine factors. Write a point as with and . Stereographic projection from gives in the closed unit ball, with at . Set and This contracts the hemisphere to while fixing . Every sphere point remains an orthogonal Clifford matrix. Apply this on and keep the Hopf map on . The universal scalar formulas and invariant projections make the homotopy continuous in the splitting.
The invariant splitting space is a compact Grassmannian. Its projection is recovered from the affine map by . Thus splitting-to-affine-map is a homeomorphism onto the affine subspace. Step 2.1 and step 3.1 show that the -connected map of step 1.1 is homotopic to that homeomorphism followed by the actual affine inclusion. Homotopy invariance of relative homotopy groups therefore makes the inclusion -connected. Equivalently, extend the resulting relative disk homotopies over cells, using [F3]. This last argument keeps arbitrary prescribed affine boundary maps fixed; it does not infer connectivity merely from a set-theoretic image.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Eschenburg–Hanke, Bott–Thom isomorphism, Hopf bundles and Morse theory (2021), expanded local argument (standard reference, not scraped)