Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Under the ultrafilter lemma, amenability is a quasi-isometry invariant for finitely generated groups

Statement

Assume the ultrafilter lemma. Amenability is a quasi-isometry invariant of finitely generated groups.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two finitely generated quasi-isometric groups G and H, and the ultrafilter lemma.

[L1]

A property of finitely generated groups is a quasi-isometry invariant when it depends only on quasi-isometry type (Quasi-isometry invariants and geometric properties of finitely generated groups).

[L2]

Under the ultrafilter lemma, amenability is equivalent to the Folner condition (Under the ultrafilter lemma, the Folner condition is equivalent to amenability).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenchoose

Choose word metrics on G and H, quasi-inverse quasi-isometries q:G→H and r:H→G, and constants λ≥1,c,DG,DH≥0 such that both maps satisfy the (λ,c) upper distance bound, dG(rq(x),x)≤DG, and dH(qr(y),y)≤DH. A fiber of q has uniformly bounded cardinality: if q(x)=q(x′), the lower quasi-isometry inequality bounds dG(x,x′), and a word-metric ball of fixed radius is finite. Let Mq bound those fibers, and define Mr similarly.

2.1L2step 1.1choose

Assume G is amenable. Let E⊆H be finite and let ε>0. Put L=max⁡{∣e∣:e∈E}, taking L=0 when E=∅, set R=λ(L+DH)+c+DG, and let T be the finite radius-R ball in G. Set δ=ε/(2MqMr(∣T∣+1)). By [L2], choose a finite nonempty A⊆G with ∣tA△A∣<δ∣A∣ for every t∈T.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Put B=NDH(q(A)). It is finite and nonempty, and ∣B∣≥∣q(A)∣≥∣A∣/Mq. If y∈NL(B)∖B, choose b∈B and a∈A with dH(y,b)≤L and dH(b,q(a))≤DH. Then dG(r(y),a)≤R. Moreover r(y)∉A, since otherwise dH(y,q(r(y)))≤DH would put y in B. Hence r(NL(B)∖B)⊆NR(A)∖A, and the fiber bound for r gives ∣NL(B)∖B∣≤Mr∣NR(A)∖A∣.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Since NR(A)∖A⊆⋃t∈T(tA∖A), step 2.1 gives ∣NR(A)∖A∣<∣T∣δ∣A∣. For e∈E, one has eB∖B⊆NL(B)∖B and ∣eB△B∣=2∣eB∖B∣. Combining this with step 3.1 and ∣B∣≥∣A∣/Mq yields ∣eB△B∣/∣B∣<2MqMr∣T∣δ<ε. Thus B is an (E,ε)-Folner set in H.

5.1L1L2step 4.1∎

Since E and ε were arbitrary, step 4.1 gives the Folner condition in H, so [L2] makes H amenable. Applying the same argument to the quasi-inverse transfers amenability from H to G. Therefore amenability depends only on quasi-isometry type, as asserted in [L1].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources