How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Antithetic variance and a monotone sufficient condition
Statement
Use the setup of Antithetic randomized sampling, assume , and put , , , and . Then and have the same law and mean, and the antithetic estimator from independent input pairs is unbiased with
Compared with the ordinary mean of independent draws from , whose variance is , antithetic sampling has no larger variance exactly when , and has strictly smaller variance exactly when this covariance is negative. A sufficient condition is that is coordinatewise monotone on (each coordinate may have either monotonicity direction). In particular, when is a subset of with the order defined by for every coordinate, if is coordinatewise nondecreasing as a map into and is nondecreasing for that order, then is coordinatewise nondecreasing.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The sampler, product-uniform inputs, IID input pairs, measurability, and finite second moment in the Statement.
Antithetic randomized sampling: The input coordinates are independent uniform variables, , and the estimator averages over independent pairs.
Identical distribution and IID families: IID means identical laws and mutual independence.
Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence: Measurable coordinatewise functions of an independent family remain independent.
Independent random elements have product joint law: The joint law of a finite independent family is the product of its marginal laws.
Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: Variance and covariance are the centered second moment and centered product expectation.
Covariance is symmetric and bilinear in finite linear combinations: Covariance is symmetric and bilinear on finite square-integrable linear combinations.
Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables: Products of independent integrable variables have factored expectations.
Oppositely monotone functions of independent coordinates have nonpositive covariance: Square-integrable oppositely monotone functions of independent coordinates have nonpositive covariance.
Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation: Expectation is linear for integrable finite sums.
Change of variables for expectation: If has law , then and, when integrable, .
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the Statement.
For a uniform coordinate, for every , since and the left limit of this cdf at is also . Thus for , . By [F3], the reflected coordinates remain independent; [F4] then shows has the same product-uniform law as . Therefore both and have law . Applying [F10] to and identifies their means and variances as and , so and have the same law, mean , and variance .
The pair value is a measurable function of . Thus the are IID by [F2]–[F3], each has mean by [F9], and their average is unbiased.
By [F5]–[F6], . For distinct , the centered are independent, so [F7] gives zero covariance; expanding the centered square of their average therefore gives the stated variance divided by .
The mean of independent -draws has variance by the same centered-square expansion and [F7]. Comparing this with step 2.1 gives the iff conditions for weak and strict variance reduction.
For each coordinate choose a monotonicity direction for : define in a nondecreasing coordinate and in a nonincreasing coordinate; a constant coordinate may be assigned either direction. Then is a coordinatewise reflection map with and . By [F3] and [F4], again has independent uniform coordinates, and is coordinatewise nondecreasing on . Define the coordinatewise clamp by . It is continuous and nondecreasing in every coordinate, and . Hence is a Borel coordinatewise nondecreasing function on , while is Borel and coordinatewise nonincreasing. On the cube these extensions equal and , respectively; the identities for give and . By step 1.1, these functions are square-integrable, so [F8] applies to and and gives . In the stated ordered-subset case, coordinatewise implies and then , which makes nondecreasing and is the special case .
Depends on
- Antithetic randomized sampling
- Oppositely monotone functions of independent coordinates have nonpositive covariance
- Identical distribution and IID families
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
- Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation
- Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence
- Independent random elements have product joint law
- Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables
- Covariance is symmetric and bilinear in finite linear combinations
- Change of variables for expectation
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Art B. Owen, Monte Carlo Theory, Methods and Examples, Chapter 8, §8.2, pp. 5–8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Paul Glasserman, Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering, Chapter 4, §4.2, pp. 205–207 (standard reference, not scraped)