Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

AP equals PSPACE

Statement

AP=PSPACE.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the classes AP and PSPACE.

[L1]

AP is defined by polynomial-time alternating machines (Alternating polynomial time and the class AP).

[L2]

TQBF is PSPACE-complete (TQBF is PSPACE-complete).

[L3]

A quantified Boolean formula is true exactly when the existential player has a winning strategy in its game (A quantified Boolean formula is true if and only if the existential player has a winning strategy in its game).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

To prove PSPACEAP, it is enough by [L2] to show that TQBF lies in AP. On input a quantified Boolean formula, an alternating machine reads the quantifier prefix from left to right: at an existential quantifier it enters an existential state and chooses the bit, and at a universal quantifier it enters a universal state and branches over both bits. After the prefix is exhausted, it deterministically evaluates the matrix. By [L3], this machine accepts exactly the true formulas, so TQBF is in AP.

L2L3construct
1.2

For the reverse inclusion, let LAP and choose an alternating machine M for L running in time p(n). On input x, a deterministic procedure evaluates the acceptance of the computation tree depth-first: at an accepting or rejecting leaf it returns the corresponding truth value; at an existential configuration it ORs the recursive values of the children; at a universal configuration it ANDs them. This exactly matches the acceptance rule in [L1].

L1construct
2.1

Now let LPSPACE. By [L2], there is a polynomial-time reduction f from L to TQBF. An alternating machine for L first computes f(x) deterministically and then runs the TQBF machine from step 1.1 on f(x). This still uses only polynomial time, so [L1] gives LAP. Thus PSPACEAP.

L1L2step 1.1
2.2

The recursion depth is at most p(x) because every branch halts within that many steps. One stack frame stores the current configuration and the remaining depth counter, both of polynomial size, so the whole depth-first evaluation uses polynomial space. Therefore LPSPACE.

step 1.2algebra
3.1

Steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove both containments, so AP=PSPACE.

step 2.1step 2.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources