Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

AP equals PSPACE

Statement

AP=PSPACE.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the classes AP and PSPACE.

[L1]

AP is defined by polynomial-time alternating machines (Alternating polynomial time and the class AP).

[L2]

TQBF is PSPACE-complete (TQBF is PSPACE-complete).

[L3]

A quantified Boolean formula is true exactly when the existential player has a winning strategy in its game (A quantified Boolean formula is true if and only if the existential player has a winning strategy in its game).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L2L3construct

To prove PSPACE⊆AP, it is enough by [L2] to show that TQBF lies in AP. On input a quantified Boolean formula, an alternating machine reads the quantifier prefix from left to right: at an existential quantifier it enters an existential state and chooses the bit, and at a universal quantifier it enters a universal state and branches over both bits. After the prefix is exhausted, it deterministically evaluates the matrix. By [L3], this machine accepts exactly the true formulas, so TQBF is in AP.

1.2L1construct

For the reverse inclusion, let L∈AP and choose an alternating machine M for L running in time p(n). On input x, a deterministic procedure evaluates the acceptance of the computation tree depth-first: at an accepting or rejecting leaf it returns the corresponding truth value; at an existential configuration it ORs the recursive values of the children; at a universal configuration it ANDs them. This exactly matches the acceptance rule in [L1].

2.1L1L2step 1.1

Now let L∈PSPACE. By [L2], there is a polynomial-time reduction f from L to TQBF. An alternating machine for L first computes f(x) deterministically and then runs the TQBF machine from step 1.1 on f(x). This still uses only polynomial time, so [L1] gives L∈AP. Thus PSPACE⊆AP.

2.2step 1.2algebra

The recursion depth is at most p(∣x∣) because every branch halts within that many steps. One stack frame stores the current configuration and the remaining depth counter, both of polynomial size, so the whole depth-first evaluation uses polynomial space. Therefore L∈PSPACE.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2∎

Steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove both containments, so AP=PSPACE.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources