How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
AP equals PSPACE
Statement
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the classes AP and PSPACE.
AP is defined by polynomial-time alternating machines (Alternating polynomial time and the class AP).
TQBF is PSPACE-complete (TQBF is PSPACE-complete).
A quantified Boolean formula is true exactly when the existential player has a winning strategy in its game (A quantified Boolean formula is true if and only if the existential player has a winning strategy in its game).
Proof
To prove , it is enough by [L2] to show that TQBF lies in AP. On input a quantified Boolean formula, an alternating machine reads the quantifier prefix from left to right: at an existential quantifier it enters an existential state and chooses the bit, and at a universal quantifier it enters a universal state and branches over both bits. After the prefix is exhausted, it deterministically evaluates the matrix. By [L3], this machine accepts exactly the true formulas, so TQBF is in AP.
For the reverse inclusion, let and choose an alternating machine for running in time . On input , a deterministic procedure evaluates the acceptance of the computation tree depth-first: at an accepting or rejecting leaf it returns the corresponding truth value; at an existential configuration it ORs the recursive values of the children; at a universal configuration it ANDs them. This exactly matches the acceptance rule in [L1].
Now let . By [L2], there is a polynomial-time reduction from to TQBF. An alternating machine for first computes deterministically and then runs the TQBF machine from step 1.1 on . This still uses only polynomial time, so [L1] gives . Thus .
The recursion depth is at most because every branch halts within that many steps. One stack frame stores the current configuration and the remaining depth counter, both of polynomial size, so the whole depth-first evaluation uses polynomial space. Therefore .
Steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove both containments, so .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sanjeev Arora and Boaz Barak, Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach (standard reference, not scraped)