How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
TQBF is PSPACE-complete
Statement
TQBF lies in PSPACE, and every language in PSPACE polynomial-time many-one reduces to TQBF. Therefore TQBF is PSPACE-complete.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the language TQBF and an arbitrary language .
TQBF belongs to PSPACE (TQBF is in PSPACE).
For a fixed multitape machine running in space , a configuration is determined by its state, finitely many head positions, and the contents of at most visited cells, so configurations admit encodings of length (Multitape and nondeterministic Turing machine variants, Worst-case time and space complexity of a machine).
A polynomial-space machine has at most exponentially many configurations (A machine using space s(n) has at most exponentially many configurations).
The formulas are the reachability formulas of The quantified formula expressing reachability between two configurations.
Those formulas have only polynomial size when the configuration length and the index are polynomially bounded (Quantifier reuse keeps the reachability formulas polynomial in size).
A polynomial-time many-one reduction is a polynomial-time computable map preserving yes and no instances exactly (Polynomial-time many-one reductions).
Proof
The membership part is exactly [L1]. So it remains to prove PSPACE-hardness.
Because , there is a deterministic machine deciding in space for some polynomial . Fix an input of length . By [L2], configurations of on can be encoded by bit strings of length . If has more than one accepting configuration, adjoin one fresh sink vertex and one edge from every accepting configuration to ; this changes the encoding length by at most one bit and preserves acceptance.
By [L3], the resulting graph has at most vertices for some constant . Choose large enough that exceeds this number, and form the quantified Boolean formula using [L4].
We claim that is true if and only if accepts . The proof is by induction on the index used in [L4]. For , says exactly that or that one legal edge joins to . For , the formula chooses a midpoint and then, by the universal choice of the selector bit , forces one recursive call to certify the left half and one to certify the right half. Hence is true exactly when there is a path from to of length at most . With and , this means exactly that accepts .
By [L5], has polynomial size. Because the transition table of is fixed and the configuration length is polynomial, the formula can be written down from in polynomial time. Step 3.1 shows , so by [L6] the map is a polynomial-time many-one reduction from to TQBF.
Steps 1.1 and 4.1 prove that TQBF is in PSPACE and PSPACE-hard. Therefore TQBF is PSPACE-complete.
Depends on
- TQBF is in PSPACE
- A machine using space s(n) has at most exponentially many configurations
- The quantified formula expressing reachability between two configurations
- Quantifier reuse keeps the reachability formulas polynomial in size
- Polynomial-time many-one reductions
- Multitape and nondeterministic Turing machine variants
- Worst-case time and space complexity of a machine
Used by
- Ph complete language forces collapse Corollary
- Polynomial space oracle absorption Lemma
- AP equals PSPACE Theorem
- PSPACE is contained in IP Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sanjeev Arora and Boaz Barak, Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach (standard reference, not scraped)
- Eric Blais, Models of Computation, 17. Space Complexity (standard reference, not scraped)