How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Associated primes in a short exact sequence
Statement
If
is a short exact sequence of left -modules, then
In particular,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring and a short exact sequence of left -modules.
In a short exact sequence, associated primes of the left term lie in those of the middle term (Associated primes of a submodule lie in those of the ambient module).
In a short exact sequence, associated primes of the middle term lie in those of the outer terms (Associated primes of the middle term lie in those of the ends).
Proof
Facts [L1] and [L2] give
Apply step 1.1 to the split exact sequence This gives . The reverse inclusion follows by applying the left inclusion of step 1.1 to the two canonical injections and .
Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove the theorem and its direct-sum corollary.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., Proposition (17.5) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 10.63.3 (standard reference, not scraped)