How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An S-rational map defined after a faithfully flat smooth base change is defined
Statement
Assume AC. Let be locally Noetherian (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes), let be separated over (Separated morphism of schemes), and let be an -rational map between smooth finite-type -schemes (S-dense open subschemes and S-rational maps). Let be a faithfully flat morphism of smooth finite-type -schemes (Faithfully flat scheme morphism) such that the base-changed -rational map is represented by an -morphism defined on all of . Then is represented by an -morphism defined on all of . This is BLR 2.5/5; no arbitrary base change is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a locally Noetherian base , a separated -scheme , smooth finite-type -schemes , an -rational map and a faithfully flat -morphism such that is defined everywhere and equal to a morphism .
An -rational map is an equivalence class of -morphisms on -dense opens, with domain of definition ; base change preserves these notions, and for separated smooth finite-type targets the domain commutes with flat base change (S-dense open subschemes and S-rational maps).
A faithfully flat, quasi-compact, locally finitely presented morphism is a cover for fppf descent of morphisms: a morphism whose two pullbacks to agree descends uniquely (Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent, assuming AC). Faithfully flat morphisms are surjective (Faithfully flat scheme morphism).
For a separated target, morphisms from any source that agree on a schematically dense open are equal (Agreement on a schematically dense open, assuming AC). A smooth morphism is flat with geometrically reduced fibres (Smooth morphism of schemes). On affine charts of a smooth finite-type map with Noetherian, a finite prime filtration of the -module tensors exactly with the flat -algebra and filters by the rings . Each is flat over the domain , hence injects into its reduced generic fibre and is reduced. In a reduced Noetherian ring every associated prime is minimal: the ring injects into the finite product of its minimal-prime domain quotients, so the annihilator of a nonzero element is the intersection of those minimal primes where its image is nonzero; if this annihilator is prime, it equals one of those minimal primes. Flatness over makes every nonzero base element a nonzerodivisor, so these minimal primes contract to . The associated-prime theorem for a finite filtration then shows every associated prime of is the generic point of a component of some fibre. If an open meets every fibre densely but , this finite ideal has an associated prime; it is also associated in , so its point lies in , where the restriction kernel has zero stalk, a contradiction. Hence is schematically dense. These uses are supplied by Finite modules over Noetherian rings admit prime filtrations, A nonzero module over a Noetherian ring has an associated prime, and Associated primes in a short exact sequence.
If is schematically dense and is flat, then is schematically dense in . Locally take and an affine ; flatness makes flat over . The open is quasi-compact since is locally Noetherian. A finite principal-open cover computes as a finite equalizer of localizations of ; tensoring this equalizer with flat computes and preserves the injection . Thus , which is the required schematic density. Flatness is stable under base change (Flatness is stable under arbitrary base change).
The given hypotheses make faithfully flat, quasi-compact, and locally of finite presentation. To see the latter two properties, work locally on affine Noetherian opens . For affine charts and with , both and are finite-type -algebras; generators of over also generate it over , so is finite type over . The ring is Noetherian because it is of finite type over the Noetherian ring , and a finite-type algebra over is finitely presented, proving local finite presentation (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras, Locally finite presentation morphisms, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, If is Noetherian then is Noetherian for every , Finite type is affine-local on source and target). For quasi-compactness, cover any quasi-compact open by finitely many affine opens each lying over an affine Noetherian open . Each is open in the Noetherian finite-type -scheme , hence is quasi-compact; therefore is quasi-compact. Faithful flatness is given (Faithfully flat scheme morphism).
Proof
Let . Since is smooth over and is -dense, [F3] makes schematically dense in . Its pullback is schematically dense in by [F4]. The everywhere-defined representative and the morphism agree on an -dense open by the definition of ; that open is schematically dense in the smooth scheme by [F3]. Separatedness of and [F3] therefore give .
Put and let be the composite of either projection with . This map is flat: each projection is a base change of the flat map , hence flat by [F4], and compositions of flat morphisms are flat. The open is schematically dense in by [F4]. By step 1.1, the two pullbacks of agree on , where both are the composite of the common map to with . As is separated over , [F3] gives equality of these pullbacks on all of .
By [F5], is faithfully flat, quasi-compact and locally finitely presented; by step 2.1 the two pullbacks of to agree. Fppf descent of morphisms [F2] therefore gives a unique -morphism with .
The morphism extends : on , the morphisms and pull back along the faithfully flat morphism to the same map by step 1.1. Uniqueness in [F2] makes them equal. Hence is a morphism on all of whose restriction to the -dense open represents , so it represents the -rational map . [F2, step 1.1, step 3.1].
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- S-dense open subschemes and S-rational maps
- Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent
- Faithfully flat scheme morphism
- Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes
- Locally finite presentation morphisms
- Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras
- Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring
- If $R$ is Noetherian then $R[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$ is Noetherian for every $n\in\mathbb N$
- Finite type is affine-local on source and target
- Finite modules over Noetherian rings admit prime filtrations
- A nonzero module over a Noetherian ring has an associated prime
- Associated primes in a short exact sequence
- Flatness is stable under arbitrary base change
- Separated morphism of schemes
- Agreement on a schematically dense open
- Smooth morphism of schemes
Used by
- Birational group law Lemma
- Effective ample-pair and group descent from a strict henselization Lemma
- Finite translate completion and uniqueness Lemma
- Full minimal model embedding Lemma
- Projective weak models and rational mapping Lemma
- Separated translate gluing Lemma
- Strict law graph calculus Lemma
- Strictification Lemma
- Weil's extension theorem for rational maps into smooth separated group schemes Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bosch, Lutkebohmert, Raynaud, Neron Models (1990), 2.5/5 (descent of S-rational maps) (standard reference, not scraped)