Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An S-rational map defined after a faithfully flat smooth base change is defined

Statement

Assume AC. Let S be locally Noetherian (Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes), let Y be separated over S (Separated morphism of schemes), and let u:X⇢Y be an S-rational map between smooth finite-type S-schemes (S-dense open subschemes and S-rational maps). Let f:X′→X be a faithfully flat morphism of smooth finite-type S-schemes (Faithfully flat scheme morphism) such that the base-changed S-rational map u∘f:X′⇢Y is represented by an S-morphism X′→Y defined on all of X′. Then u is represented by an S-morphism X→Y defined on all of X. This is BLR 2.5/5; no arbitrary base change is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a locally Noetherian base S, a separated S-scheme Y, smooth finite-type S-schemes X,X′, an S-rational map u:X⇢Y and a faithfully flat S-morphism f:X′→X such that u∘f is defined everywhere and equal to a morphism g:X′→Y.

[F1]

An S-rational map is an equivalence class of S-morphisms on S-dense opens, with domain of definition dom⁡(u); base change preserves these notions, and for separated smooth finite-type targets the domain commutes with flat base change (S-dense open subschemes and S-rational maps).

[F2]

A faithfully flat, quasi-compact, locally finitely presented morphism is a cover for fppf descent of morphisms: a morphism whose two pullbacks to X′×XX′ agree descends uniquely (Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent, assuming AC). Faithfully flat morphisms are surjective (Faithfully flat scheme morphism).

[F3]

For a separated target, morphisms from any source that agree on a schematically dense open are equal (Agreement on a schematically dense open, assuming AC). A smooth morphism is flat with geometrically reduced fibres (Smooth morphism of schemes). On affine charts Spec⁡B→Spec⁡A of a smooth finite-type map with A Noetherian, a finite prime filtration of the A-module A tensors exactly with the flat A-algebra B and filters B by the rings B/piB. Each is flat over the domain A/pi, hence injects into its reduced generic fibre and is reduced. In a reduced Noetherian ring every associated prime is minimal: the ring injects into the finite product of its minimal-prime domain quotients, so the annihilator of a nonzero element is the intersection of those minimal primes where its image is nonzero; if this annihilator is prime, it equals one of those minimal primes. Flatness over A/pi makes every nonzero base element a nonzerodivisor, so these minimal primes contract to pi. The associated-prime theorem for a finite filtration then shows every associated prime of B is the generic point of a component of some fibre. If an open U meets every fibre densely but ker⁡(B→Γ(U,O))≠0, this finite ideal has an associated prime; it is also associated in B, so its point lies in U, where the restriction kernel has zero stalk, a contradiction. Hence U is schematically dense. These uses are supplied by Finite modules over Noetherian rings admit prime filtrations, A nonzero module over a Noetherian ring has an associated prime, and Associated primes in a short exact sequence.

[F4]

If U⊆X is schematically dense and q:T→X is flat, then q−1(U) is schematically dense in T. Locally take V=Spec⁡A⊆X and an affine W=Spec⁡B⊆q−1(V); flatness makes B flat over A. The open U∩V is quasi-compact since X is locally Noetherian. A finite principal-open cover computes Γ(U∩V,O) as a finite equalizer of localizations of A; tensoring this equalizer with flat B computes Γ(W×XU,O) and preserves the injection A↪Γ(U∩V,O). Thus B↪Γ(W×XU,O), which is the required schematic density. Flatness is stable under base change (Flatness is stable under arbitrary base change).

[F5]

The given hypotheses make f faithfully flat, quasi-compact, and locally of finite presentation. To see the latter two properties, work locally on affine Noetherian opens S0=Spec⁡A⊆S. For affine charts W=Spec⁡C⊆X′ and V=Spec⁡B⊆X with f(W)⊆V⊆XS0, both B and C are finite-type A-algebras; generators of C over A also generate it over B, so C is finite type over B. The ring B is Noetherian because it is of finite type over the Noetherian ring A, and a finite-type algebra over B is finitely presented, proving local finite presentation (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras, Locally finite presentation morphisms, Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring, If R is Noetherian then R[x1,…,xn] is Noetherian for every n∈N, Finite type is affine-local on source and target). For quasi-compactness, cover any quasi-compact open V0⊆X by finitely many affine opens Vi each lying over an affine Noetherian open Si⊆S. Each f−1(Vi) is open in the Noetherian finite-type Si-scheme XSi′, hence is quasi-compact; therefore f−1(V0) is quasi-compact. Faithful flatness is given (Faithfully flat scheme morphism).

Proof

technique · direct, descending the representative along the faithfully flat cover
1.1F3F4F1given

Let U=dom⁡(u). Since X is smooth over S and U is S-dense, [F3] makes U schematically dense in X. Its pullback U′=f−1(U) is schematically dense in X′ by [F4]. The everywhere-defined representative g:X′→Y and the morphism u∣U∘f∣U′:U′→Y agree on an S-dense open by the definition of u∘f; that open is schematically dense in the smooth scheme U′ by [F3]. Separatedness of Y and [F3] therefore give g∣U′=u∣U∘f∣U′.

2.1F4F3step 1.1givenalgebra

Put X′′=X′×XX′ and let q:X′′→X be the composite of either projection with f. This map is flat: each projection is a base change of the flat map f, hence flat by [F4], and compositions of flat morphisms are flat. The open W=q−1(U)=f−1(U)×Uf−1(U) is schematically dense in X′′ by [F4]. By step 1.1, the two pullbacks of g agree on W, where both are the composite of the common map to U with u∣U. As Y is separated over S, [F3] gives equality of these pullbacks on all of X′′.

3.1F5F2step 2.1construct

By [F5], f is faithfully flat, quasi-compact and locally finitely presented; by step 2.1 the two pullbacks of g to X′′ agree. Fppf descent of morphisms [F2] therefore gives a unique S-morphism h:X→Y with h∘f=g.

4.1F2step 1.1step 3.1∎

The morphism h extends u: on U, the morphisms h∣U and u∣U pull back along the faithfully flat morphism f−1(U)→U to the same map g∣f−1(U) by step 1.1. Uniqueness in [F2] makes them equal. Hence h is a morphism on all of X whose restriction to the S-dense open U represents u, so it represents the S-rational map u. [F2, step 1.1, step 3.1].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources