Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Full minimal model embedding

Statement

Assume AC and DC as inherited from the supplied algebra and scheme results. Let R be a discrete valuation ring with fraction field K, residue field k and a chosen strict henselization Rsh, and let A/K be an abelian variety. Let X be the smooth separated finite-type faithfully flat R-model of A supplied by Separated minimal union and translations, with strictification U⊆X, and let G be the descended group completion over R of the strict law on URsh (Effective ample-pair and group descent from a strict henselization). Then G contains the full model X, not only its strictification U, as an R-dense open subscheme.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and DC, a discrete valuation ring R with fraction field K and residue field k, a strict henselization Rsh, an abelian variety A/K, the separated minimal model X/R of Separated minimal union and translations with strictification U⊆X, and the descended group completion G/R containing U as an R-dense open.

[F1]

X is smooth, separated, finite type and faithfully flat over the regular Noetherian base R, integral with generic fibre A, and U⊆X is an R-dense (fibre-dense) open subscheme carrying a strict R-birational group law; URsh is an open subscheme of the smooth separated finite-type Rsh-group scheme H, which descends to the smooth separated finite-type R-group scheme G containing U (Separated minimal union and translations, Effective ample-pair and group descent from a strict henselization, S-dense open subschemes and S-rational maps).

[F2]

A rational map from a smooth S-scheme to a smooth separated finite-type S-group scheme over a regular Noetherian base which is defined at every height-one point extends uniquely to an S-morphism (Weil's extension theorem for rational maps into smooth separated group schemes).

[F3]

On a smooth finite-type R-scheme the total space is regular, hence normal and locally factorial, and a nonzero rational section of a line bundle has a Cartier divisor of pure codimension one; a Noetherian normal domain is the intersection of its height-one localizations, so a rational function regular at every height-one point is regular (Regularity ascends and descends along a flat local homomorphism, Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres, Regular local rings are unique factorization domains, Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors, A normal Noetherian domain is the intersection of its height-one localizations).

[F4]

A smooth R-group scheme has translation-invariant top forms; a morphism between smooth models of equal relative dimension is etale where its top differential is an isomorphism (Invariant volume and finite minimal classes, Dilatations and defect computation). Two morphisms from a reduced source to a separated target agree on the entire source if they agree on a schematically dense open (Agreement on a schematically dense open). Descent additionally requires a faithfully flat cover and equality of the two pullbacks; no descent is inferred from reducedness or separatedness alone.

[F5]

Zariski's main factorization: a separated quasi-finite morphism to a quasi-compact base factors as an open immersion followed by a finite morphism, locally on the base (Scheme Zariski Main factorization for separated quasi-finite morphisms).

Proof

technique · direct: extend the identity rational map $X\dashrightarrow G$ using the codimension-one criterion, show its invariant volume is a unit so that it is etale, and conclude by the scheme Hartogs and Zariski-factorization argument that it is an open immersion
1.1F1givenconstruct

The generic fibre of X is A=XK, and GK is the group completion of the strict law on UK=A; hence the identity of A defines a rational map φ:X⇢G over R which on U is the given open immersion U↪G. Every height-one point of X lies either in the generic fibre (where φ is defined, since it is the identity of A) or is a generic point of an irreducible component of the special fibre. Since U is R-dense, its complement contains no irreducible component of any fibre, so U contains the generic point of every component of the special fibre; therefore φ is defined at every height-one point of X.

2.1F1F2step 1.1construct

The base R is a regular Noetherian scheme, X is smooth over R and G is a smooth separated finite-type R-group scheme, so the codimension-one extension criterion [F2] applies to φ and produces a unique R-morphism ψ:X→G extending φ. On the generic fibre ψK is the identity of A, so ψ is birational.

3.1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

We show that ψ is etale. Its top differential is a section of the invertible sheaf Hom⁡(ψ∗⋀gΩG/R,⋀gΩX/R). It is a unit on U, where ψ is the given open immersion, and on the generic fibre, where it is the identity. Thus it is nonzero generically, and its zero divisor can only be supported in X∖U. Step 1.1 shows that U contains every height-one point. Since X is regular and integral, the zero locus of a nonzero section of an invertible sheaf is an effective Cartier divisor of pure codimension one, unless empty. There is no possible codimension-one support, so the section is nowhere zero and the top differential is an isomorphism. The differential criterion [F4] makes ψ etale. This argument requires no global trivialization of the canonical bundle of the preliminary model.

4.1F3F5step 3.1algebra

The morphism ψ is separated, because X and G are separated over R, and it is quasi-finite: it is etale, hence locally quasi-finite, and it is a morphism of finite type between quasi-compact schemes, hence quasi-compact; a quasi-compact locally quasi-finite morphism is quasi-finite. Being etale and birational, and having reduced integral source and normal target (smooth over the DVR), it is an open immersion: apply Zariski's main factorization [F5] locally on G to write ψ=g∘j with j:X↪Z an open immersion and g:Z→G finite. Replace Z by the reduced closure of its birational generic component, which still contains j(X). Its coordinate algebra is a finite integral subalgebra of the common function field containing the normal target algebra, so it equals that target algebra. Thus g is an isomorphism on this component and ψ is an open immersion.

5.1F1step 4.1givenalgebra∎

Consequently ψ identifies X with an open subscheme of G containing U; since the completion already contains U as an R-dense open by [F1], the larger image of X is R-dense in G. This is the assertion that the descended completion contains the full separated minimal model X, not only the strictification U, as an R-dense open.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

146 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources