Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Existence of Neron models for abelian varieties over a discrete valuation ring

Statement

Assume AC and DC. Let R be an arbitrary discrete valuation ring with fraction field K and residue field k, and let AK be an abelian variety over K. Then there exists a smooth separated finite-type R-group scheme N with generic fibre AK such that for every smooth R-scheme Z restriction Hom⁡R(Z,N)⟶Hom⁡K(ZK,AK) is bijective. The model N is unique up to a unique isomorphism inducing the given identity on generic fibres. No excellence, completeness, perfect-residue-field or reduction-type hypothesis is imposed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and DC, an arbitrary discrete valuation ring R with fraction field K and residue field k, and an abelian variety AK over K.

[F1]

There exists a smooth separated finite-type faithfully flat R-model X of AK carrying a birational group law with birational universal translations; the law restricts to a strict law on an R-dense model open U⊆X, whose multiplication domain is an open of U×RU with strict universal translations, given by graph closures (Separated minimal union and translations, Birational group law, Strictification, Strict law graph calculus).

[F2]

Over a strict henselization Rsh, finitely many section translates complete the strict law to a smooth separated finite-type Rsh-group scheme H containing URsh as a fibre-dense open, uniquely; the canonical descent datum on this completion is effective and gives a smooth separated finite-type R-group scheme G containing U, and the full model X embeds in G as an R-dense open (Finite translate completion and uniqueness, Effective ample-pair and group descent from a strict henselization, Full minimal model embedding).

[F3]

If S is a regular Noetherian base, Z smooth over S, G a smooth separated finite-type S-group scheme, and an S-rational map Z⇢G is defined at every height-one point of Z, then it extends uniquely to an S-morphism Z→G (Weil's extension theorem for rational maps into smooth separated group schemes).

[F4]

Domains of R-rational maps are fibre-dense; morphisms into a separated target that agree on a schematically dense open agree everywhere (S-dense open subschemes and S-rational maps, Agreement on a schematically dense open).

[F5]

Morphisms descend along faithfully flat, quasi-compact, locally finitely presented covers when the two pullbacks agree (Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent, Faithfully flat scheme morphism). A finitely presented open neighbourhood and morphism over a filtered-colimit local ring spread to a finite stage (Finite-stage descent of finitely presented schemes and their morphisms).

[F6]

Two smooth separated finite-type R-models of AK satisfying the extension property are uniquely isomorphic over R compatibly with their specified generic-fibre identifications; Neron models over Dedekind bases are compatible with etale base change (Uniqueness, weak Neron property, etale base change and local nature of Neron models, Neron models, the Neron mapping property and weak Neron models).

Proof

technique · build the group model from the minimal model, strictification and effective completion. For the mapping property, extend the generic translation on the minimal model by the codimension-one Weil criterion and descend its value using the faithfully flat model cover
1.1F1F2givenconstruct

By [F1] construct the separated minimal model X of AK, its strictification U, and finally by [F2] the descended smooth separated finite-type R-group scheme G with generic fibre GK=AK and X⊆G as an R-dense open.

1.2F1F2F3F4F5givenconstruct

To prove the mapping property, let Z be a smooth R-scheme and uK:ZK→AK a K-morphism. Work first with Z of finite type; arbitrary Z is covered by finite-type opens and the unique extensions glue. Put Y=Z×RX. On its generic fibre define θK:YK→GK by θK(z,x)=uK(z)x, using the group law of GK=AK. For each generic point η of an irreducible component of Zk, the local ring R′=OZ,η is a DVR, with fraction field K′, and restriction of uK along Spec⁡K′→ZK gives a point of AK(K′). The translation supplier Separated minimal union and translations extends translation by this point to an R′-birational self-map of XR′ which is an open immersion on its R′-dense domain. This domain contains the generic point of every component of the special fibre of XR′, so θK extends at the corresponding generic points of Yk. Since R′ is the filtered colimit of the rings of affine neighbourhoods of η, finite-presentation descent [F5] spreads a quasi-compact open neighbourhood and its morphism to G to a neighbourhood in Y of each such point. There are finitely many vertical generic points. Together with the generic fibre, these neighbourhoods form an R-dense open in Y; the local maps agree on overlaps because the generic fibre is schematically dense in each overlap and G is separated ([F4]), so they glue to an R-rational map θ:Y⇢G. It is defined at every height-one point of Y: the horizontal ones lie in YK, and each vertical height-one point is the generic point of a component of Yk just treated. Since Y is smooth over the regular Noetherian DVR and G is a smooth separated finite-type group scheme, [F3] extends θ uniquely to a morphism Θ:Y→G.

2.1F2F4F5step 1.2algebra

Let j:X↪G be the dense open embedding from [F2], and let ιG and mG be inversion and multiplication on G. Define h:Y=Z×RX→G by h(z,x)=mG(Θ(z,x),ιG(j(x))). On YK this is uK(z)xx−1=uK(z), independent of x. The projection p:Y→Z is faithfully flat, quasi-compact and locally finitely presented because X→Spec⁡R is smooth, finite type and faithfully flat. On Y×ZY=Z×RX×RX, the two pullbacks of h agree on the generic fibre, hence everywhere by [F4] and separatedness of G. Fppf descent [F5] therefore gives a unique R-morphism u:Z→G with u∘p=h; its generic fibre is uK. Uniqueness follows because any two extensions agree on the schematically dense generic fibre and G is separated. This proves existence and uniqueness of the extension for all smooth Z.

3.1F4F6step 2.1algebra

Uniqueness of the model: if N and N′ both satisfy the extension property with generic fibre AK, then the identity of AK extends to R-morphisms N→N′ and N′→N. Both composites extend the identity of AK, hence equal the respective identities by the uniqueness clause of the extension property (applied to the models themselves); so N≅N′ uniquely, and [F4] identifies the canonical isomorphism.

4.1F1F2F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The construction used only an arbitrary discrete valuation ring: the minimal model, strictification, strict-henselian completion, effective group descent and Weil extension all hold without excellence, completeness, perfect residue field or any restriction on the reduction type, so the stated class is exactly as claimed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

95 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources