Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strictification

Statement

Assume AC and DC as inherited from the supplied algebra and scheme results. Let R be a discrete valuation ring with fraction field K and residue field k, let X be a smooth separated faithfully flat finite-type R-scheme, and let m be an R-birational group law on X with birational universal translations (Birational group law). Then there is an R-dense model open X0⊆X on which m is a strict birational group law. More precisely, its multiplication is defined on an open U0⊆X0×RX0, and the two universal translations restrict to open immersions there whose domains and images are dense over each of the two projections. Thus every test-valued first or second coordinate gives a test-birational translation, with cancellation on arbitrary tests. The model open X0 is smooth, separated, faithfully flat and of finite type over R. If XK is already a group scheme and the generic law is its everywhere-defined group law, X0 can be chosen with XK0=XK; this includes the commissioned abelian minimal model.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and DC, a DVR R, a smooth separated faithfully flat finite-type R-scheme X, and an R-birational group law m with birational universal translations.

[F1]

For a quasi-compact open V in a smooth Y/S of relative dimension d, the locus where V fails to be dense in a fibre is constructible: the complement A=Y∖V has local fibre dimension at most d, the locus F⊆A where the fibre has local dimension d is closed by upper semicontinuity, and its image is constructible (Local fibre-dimension bound from polynomial quasi-finiteness, Constructible images for finite-presentation affine maps).

[F2]

If a constructible subset C of a Noetherian space has nonempty irreducible closure D, it contains a nonempty open of D: write C as a finite union of locally closed subsets Oj∩Fj in D. Their closures cover D, so irreducibility makes one dense; its closed part is then all of D, and it contains the nonempty open Oj. Thus a constructible subset omitting the generic point of an irreducible component has nondense closure in that component. This proves the general topological form used here; Dense constructible subsets contain an open supplies its classical-variety instance. Smooth total spaces over a DVR are regular, and their local rings at special-fibre generic points are DVRs with uniformizer π (Regularity ascends and descends along a flat local homomorphism, one dimensional regular local rings are dvrs). These facts prove the special-generic closure exclusion in step 2.1; no assertion about arbitrary constructible closures over a DVR is assumed.

[F3]

R-dense opens are schematically dense and behave well under base change; representatives of S-rational maps agree on schematically dense opens of separated targets and descend along faithfully flat maps (S-dense open subschemes and S-rational maps, An S-rational map defined after a faithfully flat smooth base change is defined, Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent, Agreement on a schematically dense open).

Proof

technique · direct: remove the constructible bad-density loci for the two projections and restrict the law
1.1F1givenconstruct

Choose an R-dense open U⊆X2 where m is defined and both universal translations Φ(x,y)=(x,m(x,y)) and Ψ(x,y)=(m(x,y),y) are open immersions; birationality provides such a common domain by intersecting domains of the maps and their inverses. Set V=Φ(U), W=Ψ(U) and Z=U∩V∩W, all R-dense. For each projection pi:X2→X, let Ti be its constructible bad-density locus for Z, supplied by [F1]. Every generic point of every generic or special fibre of X lies outside Ti, since Z contains the generic points of all product-fibre components.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

The closure of each Ti omits every fibre generic point. On the generic fibre this follows from constructibility and the first assertion of [F2]. Its generic part has a reduced schematic closure whose ideal is saturated under multiplication by π. At a special-fibre generic point ξ, the local ring is a DVR by [F2]. A nonzero proper ideal of that DVR cannot be π-saturated: divide an element πnu repeatedly to obtain a unit. The localized closure ideal is nonzero because the generic bad locus is nondense in its integral component. Hence this generic-part closure misses ξ. The special part is constructible within Xk and omits its generic points; [F2] makes its closure nondense there as well. Thus Qi=X∖Ti‾ is an R-dense open. Set X0=Q1∩Q2; over it Z is dense along both projections.

3.1F1F2step 2.1algebra

Define U0=U∩(X0×RX0)∩m−1(X0), with images V0=Φ(U0) and W0=Ψ(U0) in (X0)2. To check density, base change to a field and fix a point a∈X0. The translation Φ(a,−) is an open immersion with dense image in the fibre; intersecting that image with V∩(a×X0) remains dense. Its inverse image imposes m(a,−)∈X0, so U0 is dense along p1. The same argument with Ψ(−,a) proves density along p2. Since Φ preserves p1 and Ψ preserves p2, it also proves V0 dense along p1 and W0 along p2.

4.1F1step 3.1algebra

For the remaining densities fix a∈X0 and put Ua=m−1(a)⊆U over the chosen field. The open immersions Φ and Ψ identify Ua respectively with V∩(X×a) and W∩(a×X), dense opens by the construction of X0. Requiring both input coordinates to lie in X0 cuts two dense opens of Ua, so Ua∩U0 is dense in Ua. Its Ψ-image is W0∩(a×X0), dense along the first projection; its Φ-image is V0∩(X0×a), dense along the second. All domains and images therefore have both-projection density.

5.1F3step 2.1step 4.1algebra∎

The restricted rational law on X0 is associative by its agreement with the original law on schematic dense domains. Its universal translations are the open immersions above, and both-projection density remains schematic density after arbitrary coordinate base change in the smooth family by [F3]. Thus they give the required test-birational translations and cancellation. The open X0 is smooth, separated and finite type; it meets every special-fibre component and the generic fibre, so it is surjective and flat over R, hence faithfully flat. If XK already carries an everywhere-defined group law, choose U to include (XK)2, where both universal translations are isomorphisms. The generic bad loci are then empty, so XK0=XK. This is the BLR model-open strictification needed by completion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

91 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources