Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Neron models, the Neron mapping property and weak Neron models

Definition

Let S be a Dedekind scheme (Dedekind domains) with function field K, and let XK be a smooth separated K-scheme of finite type. For an S-scheme X, its generic fibre is XK=X×SSpec⁡K, the fibre of X→S over the generic point of S (Scheme-theoretic fibre); it is a K-scheme. An S-model of XK is an S-scheme X together with a specified isomorphism XK≅X×SSpec⁡K of K-schemes.

A Neron model of XK over S is an S-model X→S which is smooth (Smooth morphism of schemes), separated (Separated morphism of schemes), of finite type (Locally finite type and finite type morphisms), and which satisfies the Neron mapping property: for every smooth S-scheme Y and every K-morphism uK:YK→XK there is a unique S-morphism u:Y→X extending uK, that is, with u×SSpec⁡K=uK under the specified identifications.

Equivalently, X represents the functor Y↦Hom⁡K(YK,XK) from smooth S-schemes to sets, so by the Yoneda lemma a Neron model of XK is determined up to a unique isomorphism: applying the property to Y=X and to its identity K-morphism shows that any two Neron models of XK admit a unique S-isomorphism over XK.

Local nature. For a closed point s∈S the local ring OS,s is a discrete valuation ring with fraction field K, and X×SSpec⁡OS,s is a Neron model of XK over the local Dedekind scheme Spec⁡OS,s whenever X is a Neron model of XK over S; conversely, an S-model of finite type over S is a Neron model if each of its localizations at closed points is. The finite-type hypothesis is essential for this converse. Thus the notion is local on S.

Weak Neron models. A scheme X over the Dedekind scheme S satisfies the extension property for etale points at a closed point s∈S if for each etale local OS,s-algebra R′ (a local ring with a local homomorphism OS,s→R′ that is etale, Étale morphism of schemes), with fraction field K′, the canonical map X(R′)→XK(K′) is surjective. A weak Neron model of XK is a smooth separated finite-type S-model X of XK satisfying the extension property for etale points at every closed point of S. When X is separated over S the displayed map is injective by the valuative criterion of separatedness, so the extension property is then a bijection.

The Neron mapping property applied to Y=X shows that a Neron model of XK is unique up to a unique isomorphism inducing the specified identity on XK and, applied to etale S-schemes Y, shows that a Neron model is in particular a weak Neron model. This definition asserts no existence statement: it describes what it means for a model to be a Neron model, and every existence claim on this page is a theorem with its own hypotheses. The weak Neron property is not asserted here to characterize Neron models.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources