How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dilatations and defect computation
Statement
Assume AC and DC as inherited from the supplied algebra and scheme results. Let be a discrete valuation ring with fraction field , residue field , uniformizer , and let be a strict henselization. Let be a finite-type flat -scheme with smooth generic fibre of relative dimension , and let be a closed subscheme.
(a) The -chart of the blowup is flat over and universally receives a unique -morphism over from every given -morphism with flat over whose special morphism factors through ; it is called the dilatation of along . Dilatations commute with unramified flat base change of DVRs and with products. A closed immersion of flat -schemes, with centre , induces a closed immersion of the corresponding dilatations; this is not a claim that arbitrary closed base change gives a cartesian square.
(b) For a section , the defect is the length of the torsion submodule of ; it vanishes if and only if is smooth along , and for smooth generic fibre it equals the minimum valuation of the maximal-rank Jacobian minors of a standard presentation of generic codimension, and is bounded uniformly over all .
(c) A morphism between smooth -schemes of the same relative dimension is etale exactly at the points where its relative differential determinant is invertible; in particular means that the special-fibre cotangent space at the rational specialization of has dimension .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and DC, a DVR with uniformizer , fraction field and residue field , a strict henselization , a flat finite-type -scheme with smooth generic fibre of dimension , a closed subscheme , and a section of .
The standard charts of an affine blowup present the -chart as , the quotient of by its -power torsion; the Rees-Proj blowup is locally H-projective over , hence proper, and the valuative criterion gives unique lifting of sections (Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps, Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains, Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper, Valuative criterion for properness, the last three assuming AC).
Local fibre dimension is upper semicontinuous and bounded above by tangent dimension (Local fibre-dimension bound from polynomial quasi-finiteness); smooth morphisms have locally free differentials of rank the relative dimension, and the Jacobian criterion detects standard smooth charts by unit minors (Differentials of a smooth morphism, Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis, Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres, Etale morphisms are the formally etale morphisms locally of finite presentation).
Over a DVR, flat is equivalent to torsion-free; smooth total spaces are regular, regular local rings are UFDs and the regular local rings of smooth fibres have the stated divisorial properties; the normal-domain intersection formula gives Hartogs extension in codimension one (Over a principal ideal domain flatness is equivalent to torsion-freeness, Every DVR is a PID, Regularity ascends and descends along a flat local homomorphism, Regular local rings are unique factorization domains, A normal Noetherian domain is the intersection of its height-one localizations).
Proof
For an affine chart with ideal cutting out on the special fibre and containing , the -chart of the blowup has coordinate ring modulo its -power torsion, by [F1]. This ring is -torsion-free by construction, hence flat over the DVR by [F3]. If is flat over and the special morphism factors through , then the images of the generators in are divisible by : they vanish modulo because the factorization makes them lie in , so with unique, multiplication by being injective on the flat, hence -torsion-free ring . Sending kills all torsion and defines the unique -morphism from to the -chart; the blowup is locally H-projective over , hence proper, and the valuative criterion gives the unique lifting of sections.
For an unramified flat extension of DVRs , remains a uniformizer up to a unit. The inclusion stays injective after tensoring with , and its image is precisely the subalgebra generated by and the images . Thus it is the dilatation algebra after base change. For two flat models, the tensor product of their dilatation algebras is flat over and is generated over by the fractions from both centre ideals; the product centre has ideal . The universal property checked componentwise therefore identifies this tensor product with the product-centre dilatation. Finally, for a flat closed subscheme with affine ring , the homomorphism , where is the image of , is surjective: the target is generated by the images of and , and -power torsion maps to zero. These affine surjections glue to the asserted closed immersion. The unique local factorizations in step 1.1 likewise glue for any flat source scheme .
Let be a morphism between smooth -schemes of equal relative dimension . Near choose etale coordinates , using a unit minor of a standard smooth presentation, and denote the pulled-back coordinate functions on by . If the relative differential determinant of is a unit at , the form a basis of there. In a standard smooth presentation of in variables, append the graph equations to its relation equations. Their differentials have a unit minor, so the composite is etale at by [F2]. Because is etale, this implies is etale: for a nilpotent lifting problem over , unique lifting over first gives the lift into , and formal unramifiedness of forces its composite into to be the prescribed map. Local finite presentation then gives etaleness by [F2]. Conversely, if is etale, the same lifting property identifies its relative differential map with an isomorphism of the two locally free rank- modules, so its determinant is a unit.
For a section of with smooth generic fibre of dimension , the module is finitely generated over the DVR, hence the direct sum of a free part and a torsion part, and is the length of that torsion part. If , the differential vector space at the rational specialization of has dimension ; the generic section specializes to the special section, so the upper semicontinuity of local fibre dimension [F2] gives special local dimension at least , while tangent dimension bounds it above by . Choosing local equations with independent differentials exhibits a standard smooth ambient of relative dimension containing locally along ; flatness makes the local dimension of equal to its special-fibre dimension plus one, namely , which is the local dimension of the smooth ambient at that rational point. A regular local domain has no nonzero ideal whose quotient has the same dimension, so the defining ideal of in is zero locally. Hence agrees with the smooth ambient near the specialization and factors through the smooth locus. Hence is smooth along , and conversely smoothness makes locally free, so its torsion vanishes.
Choose a finite affine cover of and presentations . Put . A section whose specialization lies in this chart factors through the chart, since an open subset of containing its closed point is the whole spectrum. Evaluation of the Jacobian gives a presentation of generic rank . Smith normal form over the DVR shows that the torsion length is the sum of the valuations of its nonzero diagonal entries; equivalently it is the minimum valuation of the minors. This proves the asserted numerical formula, with the size-zero minor interpreted as .
Let be the ideal generated by these minors before evaluation. Smoothness of the pure relative-dimension- generic fibre says the Jacobian has rank at every generic-fibre point, hence . Expressing as a finite linear combination of minors over and clearing denominators gives for some . After evaluating any -section in this chart, the minor ideal therefore contains , so step 5.1 gives . A section over factors through a chart containing its specialization just as above, and the finite maximum gives the uniform bound. Finally, step 4.1 identifies defect zero with smoothness along the section and with a -dimensional special cotangent space; step 3.1 supplies the determinant criterion in (c).
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- Affine blowup standard charts and overlaps
- Affine blowup algebras: normal form, nonzerodivisors, reducedness, domains
- Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper
- Valuative criterion for properness
- Local fibre-dimension bound from polynomial quasi-finiteness
- Etale morphisms are the formally etale morphisms locally of finite presentation
- Differentials of a smooth morphism
- Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis
- Over a principal ideal domain flatness is equivalent to torsion-freeness
- Every DVR is a PID
- Regularity ascends and descends along a flat local homomorphism
- Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres
- Regular local rings are unique factorization domains
- Rational sections of line bundles are Cartier divisors
- A normal Noetherian domain is the intersection of its height-one localizations
- Scheme Zariski Main factorization for separated quasi-finite morphisms
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
153 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bosch, Lutkebohmert, Raynaud, Neron Models (1990), 2.2/8-10 and 3.2/1-2, 3.3/1-3 (dilatations and the defect of smoothness) (standard reference, not scraped)