How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Baire dichotomy for a pointwise-defined family of bounded linear operators
Statement
Assume DC. Let be Banach, normed, and (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces). Either (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum), or
is a dense subset of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: DC and as in the statement.
Proof
Let . These sets are closed, and .
If some has nonempty interior, the translation-and-rescaling argument of Uniform boundedness principle gives a common operator-norm bound.
Otherwise every is closed with empty interior. Its complement is open dense, so is and dense by Under Dependent Choice, a nonempty complete metric space is not a countable union of closed sets with empty interior.
The two alternatives exhaust the cases from step 2.1, proving the dichotomy.
Depends on
Used by
- Condensation of singularities Example
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Teschl, Topics in Real and Functional Analysis, Theorem 4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)