How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Subdivision is chain homotopic to the identity
Statement
The operators and obey .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The recursive prism operator and chain map .
Proof
In dimension , and . Assume the identity on all faces of an -simplex .
On the universal simplex, the induction hypothesis applied to gives The affine-cone formula and the recursive definition of subdivision therefore give
Pushing the equality in step 2.1 forward along gives . Linearity proves the identity on chains.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Proposition 2.21 (standard reference, not scraped)