How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Basic and advanced adaptive composition
Statement
Let databases be finite-support record-count functions, with neighbors differing by one added or removed record occurrence. For , let round be a probability kernel on the th arbitrary measurable output space, conditional on every prior transcript . Suppose that for every ordered neighboring pair , every , and every measurable round- event ,
where and . If , the full transcript on the finite product sigma-algebra is -differentially private. Also, assuming AC, if every conditional round has the same parameters with and , then for any with , advanced composition on arbitrary measurable output spaces gives parameters , where
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite adaptive kernels and conditional event inequalities on arbitrary measurable output spaces in the Statement; AC for the advanced clause.
AC is assumed for the ordinary Radon–Nikodym and concentration suppliers used only by the advanced clause.
Differential privacy is the event inequality for every ordered neighboring pair.
Basic adaptive composition applies to arbitrary measurable output spaces and heterogeneous parameters, with additive sums of epsilon and delta.
Advanced adaptive composition proves the exact displayed epsilon and additive error on arbitrary measurable output spaces under AC, using joint-measure purification and ordinary prefix-law densities.
Proof
Apply [F2] to the stated round kernels and their parameters. Its every-history hypotheses and arbitrary measurable output scope agree with the Statement, and the condition on the sum of the additive errors places the resulting parameter in the declared range. This gives the basic clause without choice.
For the common-parameter clause assume [A1] and apply [F3] to the same kernels with common parameters and the stated . Its hypotheses are exactly the every-history event inequalities and parameter conditions here. Its full-transcript event inequality has epsilon and additive error , which gives the advanced clause by [F1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Cynthia Dwork and Aaron Roth, The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy (standard reference, not scraped)
- Salil Vadhan, The Complexity of Differential Privacy, 2017 manuscript (standard reference, not scraped)