How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Borsuk–Ulam theorem in every dimension
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every integer and every continuous map , there exists with . Here is the Euclidean unit sphere in .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, , and continuous .
With mod-two coefficients, , . The standard inclusion induces an isomorphism in degrees at most (Mod-two cohomology ring of infinite real projective space).
The space , the quotient of identifying and , is a nonempty finite CW complex of dimension (Real projective space cellular homology and the pinch map). Its cohomology vanishes in degrees greater than (Cohomology of a finite CW complex vanishes above its dimension).
Homotopic continuous maps induce equal cohomology maps (Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology). Pullback is a unital ring homomorphism and respects composition (Cup product is natural, unital and associative).
The Axiom of Choice is assumed through the cohomology suppliers [F1]–[F2]; the explicit maps below require no further choice.
Proof
We first rule out a continuous odd map for . Such a map descends to , . This is continuous by the quotient topology, since the composite with the sphere quotient is continuous and .
In the coordinate subspace , define Its representing vector has norm one. Replacing by negates the whole vector, so the projective point is independent of representative. Continuity can be checked on each chart where a chosen coordinate of is nonzero: choose the unit representative with that coordinate positive, which varies continuously in the ratios of the remaining coordinates, and use the displayed formula. These charts cover projective space, proving joint continuity in . Thus is a homotopy from to , where is the inclusion in the second block. The same formula with in the first coordinates and in the second block, namely , is a homotopy from to . Both homotopies lie in the finite projective subspace of the infinite space and therefore are continuous there as well.
Put . By [F3] and step 2.1, , including when . Consequently since by [F2]. On the other hand, [F1] says and that is an isomorphism in degree , so . These incompatible conclusions rule out every such odd map.
For , if never vanished, then would be continuous, take values in and satisfy . Step 3.1 rules this out, so an antipodal pair has equal images. When , the codomain consists of one point and the two points of have equal images directly. AC is inherited exactly as stated in [A1].
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Mod-two cohomology ring of infinite real projective space
- Real projective space cellular homology and the pinch map
- Cohomology of a finite CW complex vanishes above its dimension
- Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology
- Cup product is natural, unital and associative
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Proposition 2B.6, Corollary 2B.7 and Theorem 3.19 (standard reference, not scraped)