How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Under Dependent Choice, a surjective bounded operator between Banach spaces has a bounded right inverse exactly when its kernel is complemented
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
Let and be Banach spaces over the same scalar field, and let be a surjective bounded linear operator. Then has a bounded right inverse if and only if is complemented in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Banach spaces and , a surjective bounded linear operator , and a bounded linear operator .
Dependent Choice is assumed (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
A bounded right inverse means (Bounded left inverses and bounded right inverses).
Complemented subspaces are exactly the ranges of bounded projections (A closed subspace is complemented exactly when it is the range of a bounded projection).
For bounded operators between Banach spaces, injective with closed range is equivalent to bounded below (Under Dependent Choice, a bounded operator between Banach spaces is bounded below exactly when it is injective with closed range).
A closed subspace of a Banach space is Banach (A closed subspace of a Banach space is Banach).
Proof
Assume is a bounded right inverse of , so by [L1]. Define . Then , because . Also, if and , then and therefore for every ; so is a bounded projection. Finally, , so .
Conversely, assume is complemented. Then there is a closed subspace with . The restriction is injective, because , and it is surjective because every decomposes as with . Since is closed in the Banach space , [L4] makes Banach.
If , then . Hence , and step 1.1 gives . Therefore [L2] makes complemented.
The map is a bounded bijection from the Banach space onto the Banach space , so [L0] and [L3] make it bounded below. Hence its inverse is bounded, because when . The inclusion now gives a bounded linear map with . Thus is a bounded right inverse.
Steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove the equivalence.
Depends on
- Bounded left inverses and bounded right inverses
- A complemented closed subspace of a normed space
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- A bounded linear operator between normed spaces
- A closed subspace is complemented exactly when it is the range of a bounded projection
- Under Dependent Choice, a bounded operator between Banach spaces is bounded below exactly when it is injective with closed range
- A closed subspace of a Banach space is Banach
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Haim Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Topics in Real and Functional Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)