Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Branch-defined complex powers agree with integer powers

Statement

Let VC be open with 0V and let L:VC be a holomorphic logarithm branch of z on V. For every integer nZ and every zV, the branch power of Complex powers defined from a holomorphic logarithm branch equals the complex integer power of Integer powers in the complex field:

zLn:=exp(nL(z))=zn.

In particular exp(nL(z)) is independent of the choice of branch L: the right-hand side zn mentions no logarithm at all.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open VC with 0V, a holomorphic logarithm branch L of z on V, an integer n, and zV.

[F1]

A holomorphic logarithm branch L of z on V satisfies exp(L(z))=z for every zV, and its branch power is zLα:=exp(αL(z)) (Complex powers defined from a holomorphic logarithm branch).

[F2]

The complex integer powers satisfy z0=1, zm+1=zmz for mN, and zr:=(zm)1 when r<0 with r the natural m1 (Integer powers in the complex field).

[F3]

For all u,vC, exp(u+v)=expuexpv; for real x, the complex value exp(x+0i) equals the real exponential ex (exp(z+w)=expzexpw, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential).

[F4]

The complex exponential is expz=n0zn/n! for every zC, so exp0=1 (The complex exponential by its power series).

Proof

technique · induction on the nonnegative integer $m$ with $\exp(mL(z))=z^m$
1.1

Base case: zL0=exp(0L(z))=exp0=1=z0

F1F2F4base
1.2

Assume for a fixed m0 that exp(mL(z))=zm.

ihassume-hyp
2.1

By [F3] and [F1], exp((m+1)L(z))=exp(mL(z))exp(L(z))=zmz=zm+1

F1F2F3step 1.2ih
3.1

For r=m<0: [F3] and [F4] give exp(mL(z))exp(mL(z))=exp0=1, so by step 2.1 and [F2], exp(mL(z))=(zm)1=zm=zr.

F2F3F4step 2.1
4.1

Steps 2.1 and 3.1 cover every integer, so zLn=zn; the right side mentions no branch, giving independence.

step 2.1step 3.1discharge-induction

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources