Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Branch-defined complex powers agree with integer powers

Statement

Let V⊆C be open with 0∉V and let L:V→C be a holomorphic logarithm branch of z on V. For every integer n∈Z and every z∈V, the branch power of Complex powers defined from a holomorphic logarithm branch equals the complex integer power of Integer powers in the complex field:

zLn:=exp⁡(nL(z))=zn.

In particular exp⁡(nL(z)) is independent of the choice of branch L: the right-hand side zn mentions no logarithm at all.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open V⊆C with 0∉V, a holomorphic logarithm branch L of z on V, an integer n, and z∈V.

[F1]

A holomorphic logarithm branch L of z on V satisfies exp⁡(L(z))=z for every z∈V, and its branch power is zLα:=exp⁡(αL(z)) (Complex powers defined from a holomorphic logarithm branch).

[F2]

The complex integer powers satisfy z0=1, zm+1=zmz for m∈N, and zr:=(zm)−1 when r<0 with −r the natural m≥1 (Integer powers in the complex field).

[F3]

For all u,v∈C, exp⁡(u+v)=exp⁡u exp⁡v; for real x, the complex value exp⁡(x+0i) equals the real exponential ex (exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential).

[F4]

The complex exponential is exp⁡z=∑n≥0zn/n! for every z∈C, so exp⁡0=1 (The complex exponential by its power series).

Proof

technique · induction on the nonnegative integer $m$ with $\exp(mL(z))=z^m$
1.1F1F2F4base

Base case: zL0=exp⁡(0⋅L(z))=exp⁡0=1=z0

1.2ihassume-hyp

Assume for a fixed m≥0 that exp⁡(mL(z))=zm.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.2ih

By [F3] and [F1], exp⁡((m+1)L(z))=exp⁡(mL(z))exp⁡(L(z))=zmz=zm+1

3.1F2F3F4step 2.1

For r=−m<0: [F3] and [F4] give exp⁡(−mL(z))exp⁡(mL(z))=exp⁡0=1, so by step 2.1 and [F2], exp⁡(−mL(z))=(zm)−1=z−m=zr.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1discharge-induction∎

Steps 2.1 and 3.1 cover every integer, so zLn=zn; the right side mentions no branch, giving independence.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources