Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Chern character is a natural ring homomorphism on K-zero

Statement

Assume AC. Let X be a finite CW complex. The Chern character ch of Chern character of a complex vector bundle is natural for pullbacks, additive over Whitney sums and multiplicative over tensor products, and it extends uniquely through the Grothendieck completion to a unital ring homomorphism ch:K0(X)Heven(X;Q), whose value on a bundle class is ch(E). For finite CW complexes X,Y the external-product formula ch(a×b)=ch(a)×ch(b) holds for all aK0(X), bK0(Y), where the external products are the K-theory and cohomology external products.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed, exactly as inherited from the splitting and K-theory suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

chk(E)=1k!Nk(c1(E),,cn(E)) is characterized by qchk(E)=1k!itik on the flag bundle, and ch0(E)=rankE, ch(ε1)=1 (Chern character of a complex vector bundle).

[F2]

Finitely many bundles have a common splitting space over which each splits into complex lines and whose pullback is injective on integral cohomology (Complex splitting principle with integral injective pullback). Rational injectivity is not inferred from that integral interface. Instead, the construction in Chern character of a complex vector bundle proves directly, by rational Leray--Hirsch at every projective stage over a CW-type base, that each stage pullback is injective on rational cohomology. Applying that same stagewise argument to the finite common flag tower makes its composite pullback rationally injective.

[F3]

Chern classes are natural and multiplicative, and c1(LM)=c1(L)+c1(M) for complex lines (Naturality, normalization, and Whitney sum for Chern classes, First Chern class of tensor, dual, and conjugate lines).

[F4]

The tensor product of complex bundles distributes over Whitney sums, and the pullback of a bundle is formed by pulling back transition functions (Whitney sum, tensor, dual, Hom, and exterior-power bundles).

[F5]

VectC(X) is the commutative monoid of isomorphism classes of finite-rank complex bundles under Whitney sum, and K0(X) is its Grothendieck group, universal for additive maps into abelian groups; tensor product makes K0(X) a commutative ring with unit [ε1] (The Whitney-sum monoid of complex vector bundles, Complex topological K⁰ by Grothendieck completion, Grothendieck ring structure and rank map).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: AC and a finite CW complex X.

1.1

Work componentwise. A finite CW complex has finitely many path components, and cohomology, bundle isomorphism classes, Whitney sums and tensor products all decompose over this finite disjoint union. On each component where a bundle has positive rank, the splitting principle [F2] applies; on a rank-zero component the character is zero by [F1]. For a pullback fE, apply this observation on each source component: the flag bundle of the positive-rank restriction is the pullback of the corresponding flag bundle of E, and the roots pull back, so qfchk(E)=1k!i(fti)k. The rational Leray--Hirsch injectivity recorded in [F2], not a coefficient extension of the integral claim, and [F1] give chk(fE)=fchk(E) on every component.

F1F2F4
2.1

Additivity: on each path component, omit any rank-zero summand and use [F2] to choose a common splitting space for the positive-rank restrictions, with qE=iLi and qF=jMj. Then q(EF) has the combined roots, so qchk(EF)=1k!(itik+jujk)=q(chk(E)+chk(F)); injectivity gives additivity on that component, and hence on X.

F1F2step 1.1
3.1

Multiplicativity: on a component where both bundles have positive rank, use the common splitting of step 2.1. The tensor product splits as i,jLiMj by [F4], and its roots are ti+uj by [F3], so qchk(EF)=1k!i,j(ti+uj)k=a+b=k(1a!itia)(1b!jujb)=qa+b=kcha(E)chb(F). The middle identity is the binomial theorem. Injectivity gives multiplicativity. If either rank is zero, both sides vanish by [F1], so the result holds on every component.

F1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra
3.2

Extension to K0. By step 2.1 the map Ech(E) is an additive monoid homomorphism from VectC(X) to the additive group Heven(X;Q); by universality of the Grothendieck completion [F5] it extends uniquely to a group homomorphism K0(X)Heven(X;Q), still written ch, with ch([E][F])=ch(E)ch(F).

F5step 2.1
4.1

Since K0(X) is generated as an abelian group by bundle classes, multiplicativity on generators from step 3.1 extends: for representatives a=[E][F], b=[E][F] the product in K0(X) is [EEFF][EFFE] by [F5], and applying additivity (step 2.1) and multiplicativity (step 3.1) to the four summands gives ch(ab)=ch(a)ch(b). The unit is [ε1] and ch(ε1)=1 by [F1], so ch is a unital ring homomorphism.

F5step 2.1step 3.1
5.1

External products. For finite CW complexes X,Y and bundle classes a=[E]K0(X), b=[F]K0(Y), the external product is a×b=prXaprYb in K0(X×Y); by steps 1.1 and 4.1, ch(a×b)=prXch(a)prYch(b)=ch(a)×ch(b), which is the stated external formula.

step 1.1step 4.1
6.1

Boundary cases. For the trivial bundle εn one has ch(εn)=n in degree zero, matching the rank; for the zero bundle ch(0)=0. The trivial group K0() is allowed and the homomorphism is the zero map. The coefficient field Q is nonzero and contains 1/k! for every k, which is why the rational coefficients are required; over Z the character is not defined in general. AC enters only through [A1] in the splitting and K-theory suppliers.

A1F1F5step 3.2step 4.1

Source notes

Hatcher's Propositions 4.2-4.5, printed pp. 109-111, and May's Chapter 24 section 4, printed pp. 211-212, establish naturality, additivity, multiplicativity and the extension to K0; the external formula is the standard consequence for the product on X×Y, which is the product of the two projection pullbacks.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources