How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A power series of finite radius has a singular point on its circle of convergence
Statement
Let
have finite radius of convergence with , and regard as a function element on the disc . Then some point of the boundary circle is a singular boundary point of that function element.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A power series with finite radius .
A singular boundary point is a boundary point across which no holomorphic extension on a neighbourhood exists (Singular boundary points and natural boundaries of function elements).
Cauchy-Hadamard gives the exact disc of convergence of the series and makes no assertion on its boundary (Cauchy-Hadamard for complex power series, including zero and infinite radius).
A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc contained in its domain (A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain).
If two holomorphic functions on a complex domain agree on a set with an accumulation point in that domain, then they agree on the whole domain (Identity theorem for holomorphic functions).
If a power series represents a holomorphic function near its centre, then its coefficients are the derivatives at the centre divided by the corresponding factorials (The coefficients of a complex power series are its derivatives at the centre divided by the corresponding factorials).
Proof
Suppose toward a contradiction that every point of the circle is regular. By [L1], each then has a disc and a holomorphic extension on that disc agreeing with the original series on . The circle is closed and bounded in , hence compact by [L4], so finitely many of these discs cover .
The union of those finitely many extension discs is an open neighbourhood of , so some satisfies inside that union. Hence is covered by together with the finitely many extension discs. On overlaps, each extension agrees with the original series on a nonempty open subset of , so [L5] makes all the local definitions agree on overlaps. Therefore they glue to one holomorphic function on that agrees with the original series on .
Because is holomorphic on , [L3] gives a Taylor expansion On the original series already represents , so [L6] gives for every . Thus the original series itself converges on , contradicting [L2] because its radius was .
Therefore the assumption of step 1.1 is false, and some point of is singular.
Depends on
- Singular boundary points and natural boundaries of function elements
- Cauchy-Hadamard for complex power series, including zero and infinite radius
- A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- Identity theorem for holomorphic functions
- The coefficients of a complex power series are its derivatives at the centre divided by the corresponding factorials
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Henry Wilton, Riemann Surfaces lecture notes, Proposition 2.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Curtis T. McMullen, Riemann Surfaces, Ch. 4 Example 2 (standard reference, not scraped)