How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Pringsheim's theorem for power series with nonnegative coefficients
Statement
Let
have radius of convergence with , and assume that every is real. Then the boundary point is singular for the function element defined by on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A power series with radius and nonnegative coefficients.
Singular boundary points are those across which no holomorphic extension on a neighbourhood exists (Singular boundary points and natural boundaries of function elements).
A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc contained in its domain (A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain).
The radius of convergence is the one given by Cauchy-Hadamard (Cauchy-Hadamard for complex power series, including zero and infinite radius).
A complex power-series sum has derivatives of every order, obtained by repeated termwise differentiation (A complex power-series sum has complex derivatives of every order, obtained by repeated termwise differentiation).
Proof
Replacing by reduces the theorem to the case : the rescaled series still has nonnegative coefficients, has radius by [L3], and is regular for it exactly when is regular for the original series.
Assume from now on that , and suppose toward a contradiction that is regular. Then there is and a holomorphic extension on agreeing with the original series on . By [L2], has a Taylor expansion
Fix and choose real with , so lies in the overlap where both series represent . Applying [L4] to the original series about gives because every . Applying [L4] to the Taylor series about shows that as . Letting therefore yields
Choose with and put . By step 1.2, For every , where the inequality is step 2.1. Since the left-hand partial sums are nondecreasing, letting gives .
Step 3.1 says that the original power series converges at the real point , contradicting [L3] because the radius in the reduced case is . Therefore is singular, and undoing the rescaling proves that the point is singular for the original series.
Depends on
- A power series of finite radius has a singular point on its circle of convergence
- Singular boundary points and natural boundaries of function elements
- Cauchy-Hadamard for complex power series, including zero and infinite radius
- A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain
- A complex power-series sum has complex derivatives of every order, obtained by repeated termwise differentiation
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Philippe Flajolet, Symbolic Enumerative Combinatorics and Complex Asymptotic Analysis, Theorem 4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Henry Wilton, Riemann Surfaces lecture notes, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)