Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pringsheim's theorem for power series with nonnegative coefficients

Statement

Let

f(z)=n0anzn

have radius of convergence R with 0<R<, and assume that every an0 is real. Then the boundary point R is singular for the function element defined by f on D(0,R).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A power series n0anzn with radius R(0,) and nonnegative coefficients.

[L1]

Singular boundary points are those across which no holomorphic extension on a neighbourhood exists (Singular boundary points and natural boundaries of function elements).

[L2]

A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc contained in its domain (A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain).

[L3]

The radius of convergence is the one given by Cauchy-Hadamard (Cauchy-Hadamard for complex power series, including zero and infinite radius).

[L4]

A complex power-series sum has derivatives of every order, obtained by repeated termwise differentiation (A complex power-series sum has complex derivatives of every order, obtained by repeated termwise differentiation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Replacing z by Rz reduces the theorem to the case R=1: the rescaled series n0anRnzn still has nonnegative coefficients, has radius 1 by [L3], and 1 is regular for it exactly when R is regular for the original series.

L1L3algebra
1.2

Assume from now on that R=1, and suppose toward a contradiction that 1 is regular. Then there is ρ>0 and a holomorphic extension F on D(1,ρ) agreeing with the original series on D(0,1)D(1,ρ). By [L2], F has a Taylor expansion F(1+h)=m0bmhm(h<ρ).

L1L2assume-contra
2.1

Fix m,NN and choose real x with max{0,1ρ}<x<1, so x lies in the overlap where both series represent F. Applying [L4] to the original series about 0 gives F(m)(x)m!=nm(nm)anxnmn=mN(nm)anxnm, because every an0. Applying [L4] to the Taylor series about 1 shows that F(m)(x)m!bm as x1. Letting x1 therefore yields bmn=mN(nm)an.

L4step 1.2algebra
3.1

Choose t with 0<t<ρ and put y:=1+t/2>1. By step 1.2, F(y)=m0bm(t/2)m<. For every N, n=0Nanyn=n=0Nanm=0n(nm)(t/2)m=m=0N(n=mN(nm)an)(t/2)mm=0Nbm(t/2)mF(y), where the inequality is step 2.1. Since the left-hand partial sums are nondecreasing, letting N gives n0anynF(y)<.

step 1.2step 2.1algebra
4.1

Step 3.1 says that the original power series converges at the real point y>1, contradicting [L3] because the radius in the reduced case is 1. Therefore 1 is singular, and undoing the rescaling proves that the point R is singular for the original series.

L3step 1.1step 3.1discharge-contradiction

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources