Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Boundary-compatible clamped cubic interpolation is fourth order in the maximum norm

Statement

Let a=x0<⋯<xm=b, m≥1, with hi=xi+1−xi and H=max⁡ihi. Suppose f has continuous derivatives through order four on an open interval containing [a,b], and let M≥0 satisfy ∣f(4)(x)∣≤M there. Let s be the clamped cubic interpolant at yi=f(xi) with the boundary-compatible slopes s′(a)=f′(a) and s′(b)=f′(b). Then

∥s−f∥L∞([a,b])≤83324MH4≤MH4.

The conclusion uses the exact endpoint derivatives; it is not a rate claim for the natural boundary condition or for estimated endpoint slopes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A strictly increasing partition, f with continuous derivatives through order four near [a,b], a bound M on ∣f(4)∣, and the clamped interpolant with endpoint slopes equal to those of f.

[F1]

Clamped cubic spline interpolation exists uniquely gives the second-derivative system, the cubic piece formula, and the endpoint-slope formulae for the clamped interpolant.

[F2]

A uniform derivative bound gives a uniform Taylor remainder bound: if a function has derivatives through order q+1 on the closed segment between c and x, with endpoint continuity, and its (q+1)st derivative is bounded by M, its degree-q Taylor remainder is at most M∣x−c∣q+1/(q+1)!. Here the proof uses q=1 for f′′, q=2 for f′, and q=3 for f; the resulting factorials are 2, 6, and 24.

[A1]

hi>0, H=max⁡ihi, and ∣f(4)∣≤M on a neighborhood of the partition.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2algebra

Put gi=f′′(xi) and qi=f′′′(xi). By [F2], on each adjacent interval of length h, Taylor expansion gives f′′(xi+h)=gi+hqi+Rg+ and f′′(xi−h)=gi−hqi+Rg− with ∣Rg±∣≤Mh2/2; the corresponding secant slopes satisfy di=f′(xi)+higi/2+hi2qi/6+Ri+ and di−1=f′(xi)−hi−1gi/2+hi−12qi/6+Ri−, with ∣Ri±∣≤Mhi or i−13/24. Substitution in an interior row of [F1] shows that the residual obtained by inserting gi in place of Mi has magnitude at most (3/4)MH2(hi−1+hi): the first-derivative terms cancel, and the remaining terms are bounded by (1/2+1/4)M(hi−13+hi3). The same expansions in the first row give residual at most (3/4)MH2h0; expansion backward from b gives at most (3/4)MH2hm−1 in the last row.

1.2A1F2constructalgebra

Fix an interval [xi,xi+1] of length hi and let Hi be the cubic Hermite interpolant matching f and f′ at both endpoints. Let T3 be the Taylor polynomial of degree three for f at xi, and put g=f−T3. By [F2], g(xi)=g′(xi)=0, ∣g(x)∣≤Mhi4/24, ∣g(xi+1)∣≤Mhi4/24, and ∣g′(xi+1)∣≤Mhi3/6. With t=(x−xi)/hi, the Hermite basis functions for the right value and right slope are 3t2−2t3 and t3−t2; their absolute values on [0,1] are at most 1 and 4/27. Therefore ∣Hig(x)∣≤(43/648)Mhi4, and ∣f(x)−Hi(x)∣=∣g(x)−Hig(x)∣≤(35/324)Mhi4.

2.1A1F1step 1.1algebrachoose

In the clamped system matrix, each diagonal exceeds the sum of the absolute off-diagonal entries by respectively h0, hi−1+hi, and hm−1. Let ei=Mi−gi and choose an index with maximal ∣ei∣. Since the residual equation is Ae=b−Ag, its row at that index has magnitude at least the row's diagonal-dominance margin times max⁡j∣ej∣. Step 1.1 bounds that same row by (3/4)MH2 times the margin. Hence max⁡i∣Mi−gi∣≤(3/4)MH2.

3.1A1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

At an interior node xi, [F1] gives s′(xi)=di−1+hi−1(Mi−1+2Mi)/6. Substituting the backward Taylor expansions in step 1.1 and Mj=gj+ej cancels the terms in gi and qi. The remaining Taylor terms are bounded by (1/24+1/12)Mhi−13=MH3/8, and the e terms by hi−1(3/4)MH2/2≤3MH3/8. Thus ∣s′(xi)−f′(xi)∣≤MH3/2. At a and b this difference is zero by the boundary conditions.

4.1A1step 3.1step 1.2algebra

The difference s−Hi is a cubic with zero endpoint values and with endpoint slope differences ϵi=s′(xi)−f′(xi) and ϵi+1=s′(xi+1)−f′(xi+1). Its Hermite form is hi(ϵit(1−t)2+ϵi+1t2(t−1)). Each displayed shape function has absolute value at most 4/27 on [0,1]. Step 3.1 therefore gives ∣s−Hi∣≤(4/27)MH4. Combining with step 1.2 yields ∣s−f∣≤(35/324+4/27)MH4=(83/324)MH4 on this interval.

5.1step 4.1algebra∎

The intervals cover [a,b], and 83/324<1. Taking the supremum over all intervals proves the stated maximum-norm estimate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources