Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-21
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Comparison and absolute comparison tests for improper multiple integrals

Statement

For locally integrable 0≤f≤g, comparison on compact subsets gives the same inequality for improper integrals:

0≤∫Df≤∫Dg.

If ∣f∣≤g and ∫Dg<+∞, then f is absolutely improperly integrable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open set D and locally Riemann-integrable functions with the pointwise inequalities in the Statement.

[L1]

Every compact Jordan exhaustion computes a nonnegative improper integral (Every Jordan exhaustion computes a nonnegative improper multiple integral).

[L2]

A signed function is improperly integrable precisely when the nonnegative improper integral of its absolute value is finite (Improper multiple integrals and absolute convergence on open sets).

[L3]

Proper Riemann integrals on a nondegenerate rectangle preserve pointwise inequalities (Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm).

[L4]

The integral over a bounded Jordan set is the bounding-rectangle integral of the zero extension (The Riemann integral of a bounded function over a bounded Jordan measurable set).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L3L4

On every compact Jordan K⊆D, extend f∣K and g∣K by zero to one bounding rectangle. Their zero extensions satisfy the same pointwise inequalities, so [L3] and [L4] give 0≤∫Kf≤∫Kg; taking the defining suprema, equivalently using [L1] on any exhaustion, gives 0≤∫Df≤∫Dg.

2.1step 1.1L2∎

If ∣f∣≤g and ∫Dg is finite, step 1.1 applied to ∣f∣ gives ∫D∣f∣≤∫Dg<+∞, so [L2] gives absolute improper integrability of f.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources